This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:SPARQL Working Group Other specs in this tool
Status: allopen proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other Type: allsubstantive editorial typo question general comment undefined
Quick access to LC-2746
There are 1 comments (sorted by their types, and the section they are about).
Dear Workgroup, http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/#example defines a prefix/namespace for the scovo ontology. The Scovo vocabulary is deprecated and is not used in the examples. Removing the prefix namespace declaration does not change the technical impact of the normative example. Just reduces a minor source of confusion. Sincere regards and thanks for moving the standard forward, Jerven Bolleman
Add a comment.