This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Other specs in this tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group's Issue tracker
Quick access to LC-2513 LC-2532 LC-2545 LC-2546 LC-2548 LC-2552 LC-2573
Previous: LC-2552 Next: LC-2548
I am a bit unclear about the note on http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/media-equiv-av-only-alt.html, that says /Note: /A text equivalent is not required for audio that is provided as an equivalent for video with no audio information. For example, it is not required to caption video description that is provided as an alternative to a silent movie. > Surely this does not assist deaf-blind people? I would have thought that a text equivalent would be needed. Proposed Change: Providing an audio description of video only creates another file (the audio description), that needs a text equivalent