This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Device Independence Working Group Other specs in this tool
Quick access to LC-1563 LC-1565 LC-1566 LC-1567 LC-1568 LC-1569 LC-1570 LC-1571 LC-1572 LC-1573 LC-1574 LC-1575 LC-1777
Previous: LC-1571 Next: LC-1573
References: - Issues: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-cselection-20061010/issues.html#Gilman-14 - Current 2nd Last Call draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-cselection-20061010/#id2269811 Thank you for agreeing with my earlier comments. I think an editorial glitch remains, however. The wording in the current draft <quote cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-cselection-20061010/#id2269892"> >This mandatory attribute defines an expression used in determining >whether or not the descendents of the element appear in the result >infoset. If the expression evaluates to a boolean value of true, the >descendents of the if element appear in the result infoset. If the >expression evaluates to a value of false, the descendents of the if >element are omitted from the result infoset. </quote> does not seem to make it clear whether the 'expr' attribute itself appears in the results infoset. My impression is that you meant the answer to be 'no.' But it didn't get into this paragraph in the specification text. Al At 5:07 PM +0000 11/17/05, Roland Merrick wrote: >Greetings Al, my apologies, should have sent this to you and not >just to diselect-editors list. > >Regards, Roland >Tel/Fax: +44 (0)1926-465440 >Mobile: +44 (0)77 2520-0620 >----- Forwarded by Roland Merrick/UK/IBM on 17/11/2005 17:01 ----- >Roland Merrick/UK/IBM > >17/11/2005 14:44 >To >public-diselect-editors@w3.org >cc >w3c-di-wg@w3.org >Subject >Gilman-14 > > > > >Greetings Al, thanks for your comments on the content selection last >call [1]. As part of this you include "Content of ><http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-cselection-20050502/#sec-sel-if-element>the >'if' Element" which starts with: "The specification prose says that >an 'if' condition "allows control to be applied to "an arbitrary >fragment" of the host language." > >The DIWG assigned this comment the identifier Gilman-14. > >This mail documents DIWG's response to your comments. > >DIWG Response >============= > >We agree that this is an inappropriate use of the term arbitrary and >implies more than we had intended. We will use more appropriate >wording such as "The if element allows control to be applied to a >wider range of xml document fragments than does the expr attribute >alone." > >[1] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2005AprJun/0012.html > >Regards, Roland