ISSUE-63: Should PRD have a specific Ruleset construct?

PRD Ruleset

State:

CLOSED

Product:

PRD

Raised by:

Christian de Sainte Marie

Opened on:

2008-06-20

Description:

Should PRD specify a Ruleset construct, distinct from the Group? If yes: for what purpose (e.g. parameters)?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

[Admin] RIF telecon minutes, 10 Feb 2009 (from cleo@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-10)
[Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon February 10 (from csma@ilog.fr on 2009-02-09)
RE: [PRD] PRD TF telecon --> issues 63/65/62/66 comments (from pvincent@tibco.com on 2009-02-03)
[PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 3 February (from csma@ilog.fr on 2009-02-02)
[PRD] PRD TF telecon Tuesday 18 November (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-11-17)
AW: ISSUE-65 (FINAL): What halting test should PRD cover? [PRD ] (from adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de on 2008-06-24)
Re: ISSUE-65 (FINAL): What halting test should PRD cover? [PRD ] (from gary.hallmark@oracle.com on 2008-06-23)
Re: ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset construct? [PRD ] (from gary.hallmark@oracle.com on 2008-06-23)
RE: ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset construct? [PRD ] (from pvincent@tibco.com on 2008-06-20)
RE: ISSUE-65 (FINAL): What halting test should PRD cover? [PRD ] (from pvincent@tibco.com on 2008-06-20)
ISSUE-65 (FINAL): What halting test should PRD cover? [PRD ] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-06-20)
ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset construct? [PRD ] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-06-20)

At the 10-Feb-2009 telecon, the WG RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-63 with the understanding that the Group construct is sufficient.

See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Feb/att-0063/10-Feb-2009-rif-mins.html

Christopher Welty, 21 Apr 2009, 01:30:30