ISSUE-49: Naming in RIF-BLD EBNF and XML syntax
Naming convention
Naming in RIF-BLD EBNF and XML syntax
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)
- Raised by:
- Christian de Sainte Marie
- Opened on:
- 2008-03-31
- Description:
- Per actions http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/447 and http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/449
1. Should functional terms be called Expr, Function, or whatever else in the EBNF
2. Should we use long names or abbrevations for the XML tags in the XML syntax (e.g. Var or Variable)?
3. Generally, what are the naming conventions/principles? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- abbreviations in xml tags (was Re: Using Rigid RDF...) (from sandro@w3.org on 2008-05-14)
- Minutes from April 15, 2008, telecon (from adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de on 2008-04-18)
- Re: issue-49 (xml naming) and BLD (from sandro@w3.org on 2008-04-15)
- Re: issue-49 (xml naming) and BLD (from hak@ilog.com on 2008-04-15)
- issue-49 (xml naming) and BLD (from sandro@w3.org on 2008-04-15)
- Corrected draft minutes of RIF telecon, April 8 (from igor.mozetic@ijs.si on 2008-04-09)
- draft minutes of RIF telecon, April 8 (from igor.mozetic@ijs.si on 2008-04-08)
- ISSUE-49 (Naming convention): Naming in RIF-BLD EBNF and XML syntax [Technical Design] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-03-31)
Related notes:
Closed by WG resolution at F2F10 in Galway, 27 May, 2008. A few XML tag names were changed as reflected in the latest BLD draft.
Christopher Welty, 28 May 2008, 09:11:18Display change log