ISSUE-14: Proposed Phase 2 Requirement: RIF must cover RDF [NOT CP]

Proposed Phase 2 Requirement: RIF must cover RDF [NOT CP]

State:

CLOSED

Product:

OWL/RDF Compatibility

Raised by:

Deborah Nichols

Opened on:

2006-08-17

Description:

Raised at: F2F3 Posted to Issues by Deborah Nichols

Proposed Phase 2 Requirement: RIF must cover RDF [F2F3]

See the CSF topic \"Consistency with W3C specifications\" on the wiki:
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Critical_Factors_Analysis/Consistency_
with_W3C_specifications

Issue:
1. Phase 1 incorporated a Requirement to support RDF Data (Req. 4.1.9, \"RIF
must cover RDF triples as data where compatible with Phase 1 semantics.\").
2. Due to limitations on RIF Phase 1 semantics, full coverage of RDF was
postponed till Phase 2.
3. There are still open questions about what \"RIF covers* RDF\" means and what
it commits the RIF to. See topics raised in the discussion linked below,
including:
(a) RIF can express RDF deduction rules;
(b) a mapping from RDF to RIF is required (what is mapped?);
(c) bnodes are handled;
(d) is RDF syntax covered?
See F2F3 discussion transcript:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jun/att-0131/09-rif-
minutes-1.html#item3-04

*http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Design_Constraints/Terminology

This was item 4.b.8 in:
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Document_issues

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

No related emails

Related notes:

Display change log