ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens?

should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Best Practices Document

Raised by:

Daniel Appelquist

Opened on:

2005-09-08

Description:

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. RE: Zeno\'s paradox Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-22)
2. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2007-03-21)
3. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-21)
4. Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-21)
5. Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-21)
6. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-21)
7. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-21)
8. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-21)
9. Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-21)
10. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-21)
11. Zeno\'s paradox Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-21)
12. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-20)
13. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-20)
14. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-20)
15. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-20)
16. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com on 2007-03-20)
17. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-20)
18. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-20)
19. Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-19)
20. Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-19)
21. Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-19)
22. RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-19)
23. Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-19)
24. Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-19)
25. Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-19)
26. Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-19)
27. [minutes] Thursday Apr 13 Teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-04-13)
28. RE: [minutes] Thursday Apr 13 Teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-04-13)
29. RE: [minutes] Thursday Apr 13 Teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-04-13)
30. RE: [minutes] Thursday Apr 13 Teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-04-13)
31. Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-09-15)
32. RE: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-15)
33. [minutes] Thursday September 15, 2005 teleconference (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-15)
34. [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-14)
35. Re: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from parcher@icra.org on 2005-09-14)
36. RE: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from gaaron@afilias.info on 2005-09-14)
37. Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-13)
38. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
39. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
40. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
41. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from Jyri.Hagman@nokia.com on 2005-09-09)
42. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-09-09)
43. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from Tim@bango.com on 2005-09-09)
44. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from rhys.lewis@volantis.com on 2005-09-09)
45. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
46. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
47. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-09-09)
48. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
49. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from chen@research.att.com on 2005-09-09)
50. ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2005-09-08)
51. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2005-09-08)
52. [minutes] Teleconf Sept 8 (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-08)
53. Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from parcher@icra.org on 2005-09-08)
54. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-08)
55. Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-09-08)
56. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from Tim@bango.com on 2005-09-08)
57. RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from rjana@research.att.com on 2005-09-08)
58. Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-09-08)

Related notes:

Display change log