ISSUE-227: How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP?

When is new technology "new technology"?

How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies
Raised by:
Jo Rabin
Opened on:
2007-11-20
Description:
I took an action (ACTION-602) at today's CT Task Force Meeting to raise this as a formal issue.

The options seem to me to be:

a) Cut back the proposed text to discussion of how to use no-transform and the Vary header, together with various heuristics relating to the nature of content (e.g. XHTML-MP, link headers and the like)
b) Introduce new values for Cache-Control, which appears to be condoned by HTTP/1.1 in the section on Cache-Control
c) Try to use some headers that are introduced in RFC 2295 and have been registered
d) Invent entirely new headers

If we stuck to just a) we would achieve very little beyond what has already been promulgated, e.g. by dotMobi. On the other hand, going beyond that could be considered only borderline within our charter remit. Especially option d) which I don't favour.

Jo
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [minutes] CT Call Tuesday 10 June 2008 (from fd@w3.org on 2008-06-10)
  2. Re: [agenda] CT Call Tuesday 10 June 2008 (from fd@w3.org on 2008-06-10)
  3. [agenda] CT Teleconference Tuesday 22nd January (from fd@w3.org on 2008-01-21)
  4. [minutes] Thursday 13 December Teleconf (from fd@w3.org on 2007-12-13)
  5. Extending the HTTP Cache-Control header (ISSUE-227) (from dom@w3.org on 2007-12-13)
  6. RE: ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-11-21)
  7. RE: ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-11-21)
  8. ISSUE-227 recap and continuation [was RE: FW (from Bryan): ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines]] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-11-21)
  9. RE: ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from Heiko.Gerlach@vodafone.com on 2007-11-21)
  10. FW (from Sean Patterson): ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-11-21)
  11. FW (from SROwen): ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-11-21)
  12. FW (from Bryan): ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-11-21)
  13. FW: ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-11-21)
  14. FW: ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-11-21)
  15. RE: ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from SPatterson@Novarra.com on 2007-11-20)
  16. Re: ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from srowen@google.com on 2007-11-20)
  17. RE: ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from BS3131@att.com on 2007-11-20)
  18. ISSUE-227 (When is new technology 'new technology'?): How Useful will the CT Guidelines Doc be, without extensions to HTTP? [Content Transformation Guidelines] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-20)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Jo Rabin <jo@linguafranca.org>, Daniel Appelquist <daniel.appelquist@vodafone.com>, Chairs, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, François Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 227.html,v 1.1 2011/01/10 15:19:44 dom Exp $