2011-10-07-Protocol

2011-10-07 Agenda

Participants and Scribe

• Bruno Kiesel
• Barbara Schennerlein
• Sven Horn
• Daniel Schreiber
• Jens Haupert
• Boris Brandherm
• Marc Seißler
• Alexander Kröner (scribe)

TOP 1 Communicating OMM results

• W3C Provenance WG
  • OMM is classified in the Prov-WG's informal connection report as an activity of particular interest
  • However, at this point of time the impact of such a statement is not clear
• W3C Device APIs WG
  • In discussion: OMM API
• W3C RDFa WG
  • Experiment: RDFa mapping of the OMM
  • Establishing contact - OMM as a use case for RDFa? No Feedback yet.
• OMM presentation at a workshop of the AIM European RFID Experts Group
  • October 4, 2011
  • Particular interest in a binary OMM format

TOP 2 OMM XGR

• The group decides to submit the XGR on October 17, 2011.
  • October 16, 2011 Internal update submission deadline

• Final report status
  • Outline

• OMM ToC
  • Motivation needs to be clarified
    • Originally efficient access for a binary format
    • Simplified summary for users and applications (entrance point)
  • Format
    • Namespace vs. format attribute - the figure doesn't communicate that both are applicable

• Standardized blocks
  • Should be covered at least to some extent in order to create a formal background for structure and id block
  • Jens will prepare a proposal
  • Alexander will mention in the "Discussion" section that this topic might require a review

• PrimaryID vs ID Block
  • Is a primary ID needed if an ID block is available
    • Bruno argues that the primary ID should only be specified in the header
  • Who creates the primary ID, is it possible to modify it at a later point of time?
    • The primary ID is created by the original memory creator.
    • Only this ID may be referenced from the structure block.
    • The ID cannot be changed in order to avoid issues with lost structure references.

• Header example in Section 4
  • Basically, the header of the memory containing all of the blocks mentioned in the following use cases.
  • Jens will create this part.

• Misc
  • Alexander will continue to consolidate the document to distribute it to the members.
  • The members decide to invite external experts for feedback concerning the report.
  • The members don't ask for additional entries in the list of authors.
  • Daniel asks for a review of related work concerning binary representations (Section 2.5).
    • Bruno will check this part.

Next Telco

• Oktober 14, 2011, 10:00