ISSUE-41: Should SE(*) in built-in grammar be aware of schema-informed grammar?

Should SE(*) in built-in grammar be aware of schema-informed grammar?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

EXI Spec

Raised by:

Takuki Kamiya

Opened on:

2009-05-13

Description:

Section "8.4.3 Built-in Element Grammar" describes the behaviour as:

"2. If a grammar does not exist for element qname, create one based on the Built-in Element Grammar."

It does not explicitly mention how to resolve a grammar
given a qname.

This issue was originally brought up by Youenn. (See ACTION-503)

Related Actions Items:

• ACTION-503 on Richard Kuntschke to Draft response LC-2198 - due 2009-05-13, closed
• ACTION-507 on Takuki Kamiya to Make SE(*) semantics clear as to how grammars are resolved given a qname (LC-2198) - due 2009-05-27, closed

Related emails:

1. ACTION-507: Make SE(*) semantics clear as to how grammars are resolved given a qname (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-05-29)
2. Agenda for 20 May EXI Telecon (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-05-19)
3. ISSUE-41: Should SE(*) in built-in grammar be aware of schema-informed grammar? [EXI Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-05-13)

Related notes:

Display change log