See also: IRC log
<wendy> loretta's 3 may proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0364.html
<wendy> java accessibility guidelines from ibm: http://www-3.ibm.com/able/guidelines/java/accessjava.html
<wendy> custom controls: http://www-3.ibm.com/able/guidelines/java/javajfc.html
<wendy> http://www-3.ibm.com/able/guidelines/java/javajfc.html
resolution: Write an ednote in 4.2 L1 SC2 that we are considering replacing it with the other success criteria elsewhere to be created by 4.2 WG.
<scribe> ACTION: 4.2 work group go through proposed success criteria (items 4 through 9) in Loretta's analysis and other sources of similar information including IBM Java Accessibility Guidelines definition of user interface components [http://www-3.ibm.com/able/guidelines/java/javajfc.html]. Create a unified set of proposals to be linked from ednote for 4.2 L1 SC2. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/15-wai-wcag-irc]
resolution: remove L3 SC3.
Remove L3 SC3 because being an open standard doesn't necessarily improve accessibility.
resolution: Remove L3 SC1 and L3 SC2.
L3 SC1 and L3 SC2 are made redundant by new L1 SC1 and making a statement does not increase accessibility.
<scribe> ACTION: Makoto Ueki to look at the differences between WCAG and JIS to see which are language specific or general [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/15-wai-wcag-irc]
<scribe> ACTION: Yvette Hoitink to look at the differences between Dutch rules for government websites and WCAG [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/15-wai-wcag-irc]
resolution: Survey the working group regarding the number of levels.