W3C | TAG | Previous: 14 June | Next: 21 June

Agenda of 28 June 2004 TAG teleconference

Nearby: Teleconference details · issues list (handling new issues)· www-tag archive

0. In Memoriam

Some tributes to Mario available. Many thanks to Paul Cotton for organizing a floral tribute on behalf of the TAG.

1. Administrative

1. Roll call. Regrets: TBL
2. Accept the minutes of the 14 June teleconf?
3. Accept this agenda?
4. Next meeting: 12 July. Likely regrets: TBL. Possible regrets from IJ.
5. Action TBL 2004/05/12: Talk to TB and DO about editor role. (Proposal from SW that this is done).

   SW: Ack of continuing involvement/editing in some forum?

6. IJ to be acting W3C Head of Communications 1 July. IJ expects to help NW with editing, but otherwise setting low expectations for TAG participation during the summer and early fall.

1.1 Meeting schedule

Action TAG 2004/06/07: Send summer regrets to TAG list.

1. AC meeting rescheduled for 2-3 December. Does this affect whether to hold TAG ftf meeting in November?
2. Ottawa meeting update?
   1. Action NW/PC 2004/06/14: Prepare ftf meeting agenda. See email from Paul.
   2. Should we ask DO to attend the meeting if extensioning and versioning is on the agenda?

1.3 TAG Charter

Action IJ 2004/06/07: Report back on next AB meeting to discuss TAG charter and relation to patent policy. See AB meeting summary, which essentially states that they think the policy applies, but no consensus yet on how.

2. Technical

See also open actions by owner and open issues.

2.1 xml11Names-46

Was Norm email forwarded to the XML CG?

2.2 httpRange-14 status

Action TBL/RF 2004/05/13: Write up a summary position to close httpRange-14, text for document.

2.3 IRI draft status in IETF

Action CL 2004/06/14: Draft text basd on 14 June discussion and send to TAG for review.

2.4 Web Architecture Document Last Call

2.4.1 Heartbeat Requirement

Should we request that 8 June draft be published on the TR page?

2.4.2 Reviews

See the 8 June 2004 Editor's Draft.

• Action NW 2004/05/14: Propose text on tradeoffs for section 4.2.2.
• Action CL 2004/05/14: Rewrite story at beginning of 3.3.1. Consider deleting para that follows last sentence third para after story in 3.3.1. "Note also that since dereferencing a URI (e.g., using HTTP) does not involve sending a fragment identifier to a server or other agent, certain access methods (e.g., HTTP PUT, POST, and DELETE) cannot be used to interact with secondary resources."
• Action TBL 2004/06/08: For issue hawke7, ask Sandro for clarification on whether second URI should have "#". Done: Sandro said that the hashes were not the point, but that the point was that in the context of dereferencing, it does matter which URI you use. Note: IJ has removed the paragraph in the 8 June draft.

Actions from 2004/06/14:

1. DC to review section 2 of 8 June draft.
2. PC to review sections 1, 5, and 6 of 8 June draft.
3. CL to review section 4 of 8 June draft.
4. SW, NW to review entire 8 June draft.

Resources:

1. Last Call issues list (sorted by section)
2. Annotated version of WebArch
3. Archive of public-webarch-comments
4. List of actions by TAG participant

The TAG does not expect to discuss issues below this line.

3. Status report on these findings

See also TAG findings

• abstractComponentRefs-37:
  • 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "Abstract Component References"
• contentPresentation-26:
  • 30 June 2003 draft finding "Separation of semantic and presentational markup, to the extent possible, is architecturally sound"
• metadataInURI-31
• siteData-36
  • "There is no such thing as a Web site"

4. Other action items

• Action DC 2003/11/15: Follow up on KeepPOSTRecords with Janet Daly on how to raise awareness of this point (which is in CUAP).
• Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san