discussion of what's required to make progress

pauld: need to reply to commenters, prepare issue list for Basic

pauld: having decided to publish Advanced as a note, we're freer to put more descriptive content

jonc: George, you need more feedback from the WG on the patterns you've prepared

gcowe: that would be nice

jonc: are we happy with the granularity of Advanced patterns?

pauld: I'm mostly interested in Basic, are we comfortable with Advanced?

jonc: I'd like a formal review of the Advanced patterns
... are we confident the Advanced patterns haven't broken the Basic patterns?

pauld: the patterns and examples pages flag up incorrect attribution as red "status" http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/

AttributeTypeReference and SequenceSequenceElement seem to be "basic" but detected as "advanced"

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/SequenceSequenceElement/

SequenceSequenceElement should be Advanced

AttributeTypeReference looks a little over engineered

concerned there's no canonical example for GlobalElementComplexType

pauld: worried we're going to have to rerun the test report
... if we make wholesale changes to examples such this

<Yves> if we need to add patterns to Basic, we still have the possibility to do a short CR

I don't think this example can be basic thanks to Decimal type

I suspect that GlobalElementComplexType is, however, basic

pauld: propose that the example put in the spec doesn't include Decimal

gcowe: need to rebuild the test report and other pages, seem inconsistent

<Yves> Yves is rebuilding the report

<Yves> => reports done

looking at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/report/all.html

GlobalElementComplexType is a new pattern added by George

pauld: doesn't introduce any new schema elements, but has been flagged as "Advanced"
... which flagging all examples as "Advanced"

This pattern should be "Basic"!

suddenly happy!

I don't think there is an issue, this is in *all* of our WSDL examples echoAttributeTypeReference etc introduced by test framework, therefore "Basic"

draws the WG's attention to: http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soapjms.html

suggest we meet same time next week

pauld: pick up a week today!