XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Working Group Teleconference

thanks Yves for handling publication!

http://www.w3.org/News/2008#item56

gcowe: going to talk to the XForms WG about our publication

ISSUE-12: identifying a conformant schema

gcowe: added the annotation to the detector source code, in offline version, and an online version on the Origo site

<Yves> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/patterns/6/09/patternsdetector.xsl

yves: w3c service uses the stylesheet directly

pauld: our page is out of date: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/detector/

<Yves> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/patterns/6/09/detected.xsl

gcowe: looks different to the detector used by the collection

pauld: collection uses a different stylesheet, ant: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/collection/build.xml

<Yves> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/detector/test.html

<Yves> is the right page

<Yves> so http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/detector/results.xsl and http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/patterns/6/09/patternsdetector.xsl

<scribe> ACTION: pdowney to investigate using detector stylesheet to optionally generate annotated HTML [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/08-databinding-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-131 - Investigate using detector stylesheet to optionally generate annotated HTML [on Paul Downey - due 2008-04-15].

ISSUE-2: test suite

gcowe: been helping Adrian re-run WCF and BEA
... still issues with running WCF, Adrian is investigating
... XBinder submitted testcases, but had issues with echo WSDL and schemas. I've corrected the stylesheet and put back into CVS
... had issues with the CVS version

yves: will investigate

gcowe: excluded test cases were the issue

pauld: I was happy for us to ignore those cases, but cool if you've fixed them
... I still have to rerun my tests

Identifier Names

pauld: this was ISSUE-10

gcowe: been looking (again) at the simple test cases: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/testsuite/documents/names/

pauld: I think the issue you were interested in was the length, beyond 32
... the way we're geared up, we could end up with 1000's of examples if we're not careful
... suggest creating a few test cases, long names being one

gcowe: will create those examples

Moving Forward for Advanced

pauld: we need to move Advanced forward. Collection is key to this.
... Think we need to timebox this activity - maybe next couple of months ticking off the collection

gcowe: Origo schemas are now all Advanced, mainly due to xs:choice
... things are improving, really having a problem with maxOccurs, maybe we could revisit that

pauld: my issue is how as a working group we process and accept Advanced patterns into the spec
... suggesting we allow editors to add patterns to patterns.xml, so long as they are "advanced" and we'll consolidate and review before progressing the document
... so just take care to add sensible patterns!
... we'll pickup in two weeks time