Databinding WG Teleconference

19 Sep 2006


See also: IRC log


Jon Calladine (BT)
George Cowe (Origo)
Paul Downey (BT)
Otu Ekanem (BT)
Yves Lafon (W3C)



minutes from last week approved

F2F planning - suggested hotel is full

Jonc: have to drop off at 15:30

George sends regrets for next week's call

chair: let's go to ISSUE-10 and skip next week, then

ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names

Jonc: presents background on rationalle for his text

modified proposal from Jonc: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0023.html

pauld: where would this text go?

jonc: you've pushed for maybe a primer or annotated companion to the document, not necessarily in our spec?

pauld: less text may mean less comments, otoh good text may stave people making comments. This issue is contentious enough to get them anyway.

pauld: so we've three proposals, and there are two parts: the normative constriction and the explanatory text.

jonc: my latest proposal replaces the first one

jonc: i'm ok with the constriction

yves: mostly ok with constriction, but would also like to see the rational as non-normative text

george: ok with the constriction

yves: you might prefer readability and maintainance as opposed to interoperability, maybe this pattern should be a guideline, not normative?

chair: so we're back to it being a "Design Consideration". I'm not hearing consensus. let's park this for a couple of weeks.

ISSUE-2, ISSUE-12: testsuite and identifying a conformant schema

pauld: still working on the report

gcowe: working on the naming convention
... sent paul mail

pauld: thanks, we need to move the ant forward, and the two-phase pattern detection

ISSUE-68: xs:import of Schema 1.0 namespace

pauld: did some testing on this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0022.html

<scribe> ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-66 - Test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [on George Cowe - due 2006-09-26].

ISSUE-67: using xsi:type to assert Type Substitution

<pauld> I can pick up ACTION-63 as business as usual

ISSUE-57: xs:include pattern

pauld: came up with example for Chameleon Include - do we need a separate issue for this?


Is this a separate pattern, if so I'll open a separate issue for this?

gcowe: we discussed making stand-alone schemas before, I can look into this

pauld: we also need to double-check we have patterns for all our issues and examples for all our patterns, a script might help here.

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.127 (CVS log)
$Date: 2006/10/10 20:15:26 $