- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:42:21 -0400
- To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- CC: Matt Long <mlong@mvsquared.net>, www-xkms@w3.org
I wasn't paying attention at the time, but let me suggest... I think that since we no longer use QName's in XKMS, that this is not much of an issue any more. Also, since WS-Security and WS-I, et al., are now all recommending exclusive-c14n, which doesn't have the problems caused by standard c14n and embedding content, we should strike this. It's not really an editorial change, although it can be treated as such, since it's removing a limitation. We can either remove the text, and let folks like ws-i, etc., advise what to do, or we can explicitly say XKMS messages that will be embedded in SOAP documents SHOULD be signed using exc-c14n. -- Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2005 14:42:40 UTC