See also: IRC log
Date: 30 Aug 2006
> Dial-in and IRC details
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/Admin/
<scribe> Scribe: Pete
No additions or changes to the published agenda.
> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-xmlprotocol-minutes.html
RESOLUTION: Aug 9 Minutes approved as posted.
> none
> Anish to apply changes to the xml as outlined in part trios [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-xmlprotocol-minutes.html#action05]
<scribe> Pending. [See discussion below.]
> Chris to follow with Noah and get the correct URL for the part2 xml (with
> Noah's changes) [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-xmlprotocol-minutes.html#action04]
<scribe> Done.
> Chris to ping daveh on whether he is on vacation [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-xmlprotocol-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> Done.
> DaveO to respond to daveh's 3rd bullet saying that the property will be
> removed [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-xmlprotocol-minutes.html#action06]
<scribe> Pending.
> Yves to check if the latest editors' drafts link on our homepage to
> XOP/MTOM/RRSHB is correct [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-xmlprotocol-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> Pending.
> Yves to figure out where the latest editors drafts of the schema are correct
> [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-xmlprotocol-minutes.html#action02]
No ED of schema. Take from REC and update as needed.
Close.
<scribe> ACTION: Yves to add new copies of schema to CVS. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/30-xmlprotocol-minutes.html#action01]
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html
Noah has provided all his changes. Links above to EDs.
Anish: Changes need to be applied to
Part2, Schema and Part1.
... Should be able to complete by end of this week.
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/6/soap12-part3
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2006Aug/0030.html
Chris laid out 2 options in email referenced above. Several members have expressed opinions on that thread.
DavidH: Can live with Noah's changes,
but they are overkill. Could make
... shorter statements. Make noncommittal statement about how
sender and
... receiver are connected, allowing bindings to fill in useful
details.
... Email binding draft didn't need to say anything about
multicast.
Chris: It's not in our charter to do any bindings.
DavidH: This was not done as a
chartered deliverable, just an exercise,
... and it proved to work well.
DaveO: Can live with Noah's changes.
Propose that we accept, and will
... produce an updated document by EOD, to be reviewed and
published as a
... WD if no objections.
Glen: Prefer option (a). Would rather
not limit the MEP and require a
... separate one for multicast.
Anish: MEPs should closely model
APIs. Multicast is often invisible
... at API level. Prefer (a).
Pete: No reason to speak against (a);
seems like a reasonable solution
... for this WD.
Yves: MEP is not traditional
multicast; in email case, mailing list
... could generate error replies. Option (a) is good, in that it
does
... not disallow multicast.
Chris: IBM preferred (b), but could
live with (a). Agree with
... consensus.
RESOLUTION: Accept
changes proposed by Noah, and publish as Working
... Draft candidate.
<scribe> ACTION: DaveO to produce Part 3 draft changes. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/08/30-xmlprotocol-minutes.html#action02]
Anish (already has action recorded above) to draft other parts.
Will hold call next week to review and potentially approve as PER WD.
Yves: Boilerplate changes for PER are small.
DaveO: How to implement Noah's "priority feedback" suggestion:
Chris/Anish: Have used EdNote tag in the past for this.
No other business.
Adjourned at 12:41 Pacific.