SebastianHellmann/Table

From W3C Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Approach Task Ontology exists? Query, Dump Usability OWL Schema Schema/Data Separation
D2RQ uni-directional, SPARQL, LinkedData ad-hoc creation query, dump possible automatic mapping automatic mapping generates poor schema, one table per class, only datatype properties, more possible no, everything created at once
Triplify uni-directional, LinkedData ad-hoc creation display of LinkedData manual sql queries supports classes and objectproperties, early version no, everything created at once
SquirrelRDF uni-directional, access several dbs via SPARQL no, and none is created query, allows SPARQL manual no, on purpose not no
CODE (Man Li) conversion ad-hoc creation dump/batch, ?with possibility to update instance data? semi-automatic, but clear engineering process automatic learning of some hierarchy, domain/range of roles, objectproperties, 11 rules yes, separate, data is imported after schema creation
DB2OWL several DBs, aims at integration distinction between a global ontology and local ontologies, existence of a global target ontology mandatory query, uses R2O automatic basically same as CODE (Man Li), similar rules yes
DartGrid integration of several DBs integration ontology mandatory query
Relational.OWL
Protege DataMaster
Protege OntoBase
Protege DataGenie
Virtuoso RDF Views
R2O+ODEMapster
OntER(Trinkunas) verify acquisition no manual acquisition of the ontology based on ER model manual, but with clear directives, ?could be automated? conversion of ER model, similarity to RDF is exploited no, but a verification method seems to exist, to validate the handcrafted model against the db, based on a db integration tool
Habegger learning of a mapping no n.a. proposal of a learning algorithm, no evaluation some hierarchy based on theta subsumption in horn clauses, objectproperties  ??
SPASQL