ISSUE-81
representation-vs-resource
Offline Web Applications section should use the term "representation" instead of "resource"
- State:
- RAISED
- Product:
- HTML 5 spec
- Raised by:
- Michael(tm) Smith
- Opened on:
- 2009-09-24
- Description:
quoting http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7687 (Nikunj Mehta) Application cache uses the term resource where it really talks about the bits fetched from the network for a resource, which are called representations in RFC 2616. The spec should be consistent with HTTP because of its dependency on HTTP.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-10-12)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-12)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-10-12)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-12)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-10-12)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-06)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-10-06)
- RE: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) CORRECTION (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-10-06)
- RE: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-10-06)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-10-06)
- minutes of 2009-10-01 telcon (from mike@w3.org on 2009-10-02)
- Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-30)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-29)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-29)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-29)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-27)
- RE: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
- Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-27)
- ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
- [Bug 7687] Use 'representation' instead of 'resource'=?UTF-8?Q?=20in=20=EF=BF=BD6?=.9 (from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2009-09-24)
Related notes:
2009-09-24 07:53:23: [MikeSmith]: escalated from http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7687
2009-11-12 10:39:34: [MikeSmith]: see also http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8264
Display change log