ISSUE-81

representation-vs-resource

Offline Web Applications section should use the term "representation" instead of "resource"

State:
RAISED
Product:
HTML 5 spec
Raised by:
Michael(tm) Smith
Opened on:
2009-09-24
Description:
quoting http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7687 (Nikunj Mehta)

Application cache uses the term resource where it really talks about the bits
fetched from the network for a resource, which are called representations in
RFC 2616. The spec should be consistent with HTTP because of its dependency on
HTTP.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-10-12)
  2. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-12)
  3. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-10-12)
  4. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-12)
  5. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-10-12)
  6. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-07)
  7. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-07)
  8. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-07)
  9. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-07)
  10. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-07)
  11. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-06)
  12. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-10-06)
  13. RE: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) CORRECTION (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-10-06)
  14. RE: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-10-06)
  15. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-10-06)
  16. minutes of 2009-10-01 telcon (from mike@w3.org on 2009-10-02)
  17. Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-30)
  18. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-29)
  19. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-29)
  20. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-29)
  21. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-28)
  22. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
  23. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-28)
  24. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
  25. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-28)
  26. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
  27. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-28)
  28. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-28)
  29. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
  30. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
  31. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
  32. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
  33. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
  34. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
  35. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
  36. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com on 2009-09-28)
  37. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-28)
  38. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-09-28)
  39. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-28)
  40. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-09-28)
  41. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-09-28)
  42. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-09-28)
  43. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-28)
  44. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
  45. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
  46. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-28)
  47. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
  48. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-28)
  49. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-27)
  50. RE: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-09-27)
  51. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-09-27)
  52. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-27)
  53. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
  54. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-27)
  55. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
  56. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-09-27)
  57. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-27)
  58. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
  59. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-09-27)
  60. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
  61. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-27)
  62. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
  63. Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-27)
  64. ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-09-27)
  65. [Bug 7687] Use 'representation' instead of 'resource'=?UTF-8?Q?=20in=20=EF=BF=BD6?=.9 (from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2009-09-24)

Related notes:

2009-09-24 07:53:23: [MikeSmith]: escalated from http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7687

2009-11-12 10:39:34: [MikeSmith]: see also http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8264

Display change log ATOM feed


Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chairs, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker, originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.231 2009/11/16 15:00:54 dom Exp $