ISSUE-15: How to identify that a specific ODRL profile applies to a policy
Profile Identifyer
How to identify that a specific ODRL profile applies to a policy
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- ODRL Version 2.0 Core Model (Public)
- Raised by:
- Michael Steidl
- Opened on:
- 2013-09-25
- Description:
- In the context of IPTC's RightsML specification work and creating examples we've encountered this issue:
- the ODRL Core model declares that an ODRL Profile may be defined (http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/two/model/#section-4)
- but it is not defined how to communicate that a policy follows a specific profile.
Reasoning: a Profile may include limitations in ODRL variants which can only be taken into account if the application of a Profile is known. (Using extensions is usually indicated by terms from a non-ODRL namespace and causes less problems.)
Issues for discussion:
- should it be allowed to apply more than one Profile? (May be a flexible approach but may also raise issues with ambiguity.)
- how to identify: we propose to add a property named "profile", data type URI/QName/QCode
Michael
(Michael Steidl, IPTC) - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Updated ODRL Core Model (from ri@semanticidentity.com on 2014-05-17)
- ODRL Profile (from ri@semanticidentity.com on 2014-04-04)
- RE: odrl-ISSUE-18: Single URI Namespace (Raising as an Issue) (from mdirector@iptc.org on 2013-11-13)
- Re: odrl-ISSUE-15 (Profile Identifier): How to identify that a specific ODRL profile applies to a policy (from ri@semanticidentity.com on 2013-09-26)
- odrl-ISSUE-15 (Profile Identifyer): How to identify that a specific ODRL profile applies to a policy [ODRL Version 2.0 Core Model (Public)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-09-25)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
