Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.

Scope

From Colloquial Web Community Group
Jump to: navigation, search

Scope for work done by this group

If we can produce a series of statements to use to evaluate candidate work items, then we have a way to move forwards

E.g. Any work done by this group must be of use to other W3C working groups. Fairly easy to assess a candidate work item, even if it is subjective?

Suggestions please.


Things we could work on

Markup usage

How is markup used in the wild? Are the semantics of HTML elements changing because of the way people are using it. Does the expected usage, as defined in the HTML specification match reality?

Research method

Statistical analysis.

Examples

http://code.google.com/webstats/ http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama/

API design patterns

How do libraries/frameworks change JavaScript (or design APIs) to make them easier to use?

Research method

We could interview lead architects for each project about their approach.

Examples

http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-scripting-syntax-and-features/ http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-script-tokenization-javascript-dom/