See also: IRC log
Mohamed gives regrets for 18 Feb
Vojtech: We discussed this.
Norm: Ok, I'll dig back further to see what I can find.
<MoZ> Norm, w.r.t pattern see http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/07-minutes
<Vojtech> XSLT match pattern discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2010Jan/0007.html
Norm: I didn't understand, I guess.
Henry: Take option and variable
names together and make them the same as step names.
... There's no lexical shadowing, only dynamic shadowing.
Norm discusses his thoughts about inputs and collection()
Vojtech: I think we need to make it well defined behavior, or leave it as it is
Alex: Is collection() in XPath 2.
Vojtech: What I would see as the right solution would be to allow multiple documents appearing in the XPath context and we say we take the first one as the context item. But you can use collection() to get to the others.
Norm: I think this has gone as far as it needs to.
Alex: The status quo is implementation defined.
Norm: Proposal: leave the status quo, do nothing.
Vojtech: I was just wondering, but Norm replied.
Norm: I think we say
... Proposal: leave the status quo.
Norm: Test suite progress
... Has the schema test resolution quesiton been resolved?
Vojtech: It's valid-xsd-004 and
011. They're the same and one is expected to succeed and one is
expected to fail.
... One relies on the default value for use-location-hints and the other sets it to false, which is the default.
Norm: Do we have another test
that explicitly sets it to true?
... Yes, 008.
... I think we should change 004 so that it's expected to fail, just like 11.
Vojtech: Do we want to change the default on validate-with-xmlschema?
Norm: Henry, what does the world expect?
Henry: For XSV, they're true and
true, respectively. For Saxon, I think it's true and false,
... No, the default is false. That's probably why we did it the way we did.
Norm: Proposal: leave the status quo and change the test.
Norm: Mohamed observes that we
have options that are expected to contain prefixes that are of
type string. He suggests we change their types to NCName.
... I have no objection.
Henry: I don't think that's a breaking change.
Proposal: Accept this change?
Mohamed: There are at least two issues in p:label-elements
Some discussion of the questions. Type of label changed to XPathExpression.