See also: IRC log
Apologies from Norm
Accepted as circulated
http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/09/04-minutes.html
Accepted as circulated
18 September 2008 - Apologies from Paul Grosso
HST has completed ACTION-2008-09-04-01, email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2008Sep/0008.html
http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/08/lastcall/comments.html
HST: Only 4 issues not yet at least addressed to our satisfaction, if not the commentor's, of which one (008) is awaiting action from Norm and two more (015 and 020) are awaiting our joint call with the XML Security folks
RT: I think the problem must be with the word 'recognize'
HST: So we need to clarify that a processor may implement some extensions and not others
RT: Maybe changing from 'recognize' to 'implement' might be sufficient
<scribe> ACTION: HST to send email proposing to replace 'recognize' with 'implement' and asking if that does in fact clarify things [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
Accepted
HST: Assuming we wrap the
remaining issues as planned, we could
... a) publish a new Public WD; b) publish a new Last Call WD;
c) try to go to CR.
RT: Norm said he didn't think there were any issue resolutions so far to stand in the way of CR
MZ: I think we did all the substantive work before the 2nd LC doc't -- everything we've gotten since then has lead to either a clarification or a rejection
RESOLUTION: Ask the editors and staff contact to take us to CR as soon as possible
MZ: Should we explicitly invite feedback from other WGs?
HST: Let me check our charter. .
.
... Yes, we list a number of groups
<scribe> ACTION: HST to email the groups named in our charter, in Norm's absence, and ask them if they have any input before we exit Last Call [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-xproc-minutes.html#action02]
HST: Adjourned