ISSUE-82: In the conformance section, should we allow browsers to use extensions to claim conformance.

In the conformance section, should we allow browsers to use extensions to claim conformance.

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-02-03
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. RE: ISSUE-82: In the conformance section, should we allow browsers to use extensions to claim conformance. (from jrichards@ocad.ca on 2011-02-03)
  2. Re: ISSUE-82: In the conformance section, should we allow browsers to use extensions to claim conformance. (from gcl-0039@access-research.org on 2011-02-03)
  3. Minutes of Teleconference 3 February 2011 (from jeanne@w3.org on 2011-02-03)
  4. Re: ISSUE-82: In the conformance section, should we allow browsers to use extensions to claim conformance. (from chaals@opera.com on 2011-02-03)
  5. ISSUE-82: In the conformance section, should we allow browsers to use extensions to claim conformance. (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-02-03)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Changelog:

Created issue 'In the conformance section, should we allow browsers to use extensions to claim conformance. ' nickname owned by on product , description '' non-public

3 Feb 2011, 17:50:53

Status changed to 'closed'

Jim Allan, 16 Apr 2013, 14:48:42


Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, Kelly Ford <kelly.ford@microsoft.com>, Chairs, Jeanne F Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.323 2013-12-19 14:47:09 dom Exp $