WAI UA Telecon for May 16th, 2002
Chair: Jon
Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2002
Time: 2:00-3:30 pm Boston Local Time, USA (18:00-19:30
UTC/GMT)
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617)
252-1038
Announcements
none
Discussion
- Issue 529:
6.1, 6.2: Is DOM required at P1, or some
API?
http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#529
See proposed resolution of
issue 529: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2002/04/api-summary
Invited
participants:
- Jost Eckhardt, AI Squared (confirmed)
- Loretta Guarino Reid, Adobe (confirmed)
- Cathy Laws, IBM (confirmed)
- Randy Marsden, Madenta (confirmed)
- Aaron Smith, GW-Micro
- Glenn Gordon, Freedom Scientific (regrets)
- Aaron Leventhal, Netscape/Mozilla
- Jill Thomas, Ion Systems (confirmed)
- Jonny Axelson, Opera
- Roberto Gonzalez, Alva (regrets)
- Philippe Le Hegaret, W3C (confirmed)
- Issue 528:
6.2, 6.3: Security issues in some cases for write access to content. How to
handle
exceptions?
http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#528
- Issue 532:
6.9 (timely access): What "exchanges" does this checkpoint refer to?
http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#532
- Issue 531:
3.4 (Toggle scripts): Most pages will include scripts, so alert requirement
will be so frequent as to not be useful
http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#531
- Issue 530:
2.2: Definition of, determination of "xml and sgml applications" unclear. Rely
on internet media types?
http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#530
Attendance
Chair: Jon Gunderson
Scribe: Ian Jacobs
Present:
David Poehlman
Eric Hansen
Loretta
Guarino Reid (Adobe)
Cathy Laws (IBM)
Jill Thomas (Ion
Systems)
Patrick Brannan (Ion Systems)
Bill Haneman
(Sun/Gnome)
Philippe Le Hegaret (W3C)
Rich Schwerdtfeger (IBM)
Tim
Lacy (Microsoft)
Al Gilman
Jost Eckhardt (AI Squared)
Regrets:
Harvey Bingham
Jim Allan
- IJ: Send proposal for Guideline 10 modifications based on today's
teleconference
Source:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
- IJ: Propose text to the UAWG on conformance profiles for use by other
specifcations.
Source:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
- IJ: Review UAAG 1.0 for which checkpoints should be "all formats" v.
"formats that are part of the claim".
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html
- JG: Write up user scenarios for why non-text-based highlighting
important for users; notably which users.
Source:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
See
for additional questions:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0029.html
- JG: Clarify why "Max rating" used in some cases (in low
implementation experience section) and "Avg rating" in some cases. Also, delete
"+/-" with P (round down from G to P)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html
- JG: Contact developers for API requirements
none
none