WCAG Team C

<scribe> scribeNick: MichaelC

<scribe> scribe: Michael_Cooper

488

RESOLUTION: take to survey with note that it's a redo of this due to change accepted for 1201

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=488

719

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=719

RESOLUTION: take 719 to survey

757

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=757

RESOLUTION: take 757 to survey

764

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=764

RESOLUTION: take 764 to survey

1169

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1169

RESOLUTION: take 1169 to survey

1238

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1238

Depends on technique proposal at http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Failure_due_to_providing_a_mechanism_to_adjust_time_limits_that_users_may_not_find_before_the_time_limit_expires

Concern that failure technique might not be viewed as a strict failure of the SC. But rewording SC woudl be a big task. In some interpretations of the SC, this is a failure, so would like to proceed under that interpretation.

RESOLUTION: take 1238 and failure technique
... to survey

568, 1057, 1294

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=568

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1057

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1294

RESOLUTION: take 568, 1057, 1294 to survey

1167

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1167

based on survey results http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20060817-teamc/results#x1167

RESOLUTION: take 1167 to survey

1078

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1078

david to finish action, take to survey if no objections on list