See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: Michael
resolution: take to survey
<scribe> ACTION: Michael to discuss 634 with PF - is this the PFWG's interpretation of the impact of Roles? [recorded in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2006/09/12-wcag-teamc-minutes.html#action01]
resolution: take to survey
<scribe> ACTION: David to research whether spaces around asterisks that indicate required fields is significant enough for us to discuss it [recorded in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2006/09/12-wcag-teamc-minutes.html#action02]
resolution: propose L3 SC for sign language alternative of audio under 1.2, even though that wouldn't be strictly under guideline requirements about *multi*media
Question raised about SC that go beyond the literal requirements of their guidelines
correction: L3 SC to be proposed under 1.1, not under 1.2
resolution: do a straw-poll survey querying the group's feeling about the two alternatives in the Working Group notes
resolution: take to survey
move to cognitive discussion
discuss next week: removing underlines from links (with no other visual modification) is technically a failure, but leaving underlines on links can be a real mess on some sites
should discuss in context of other issues in 1.3.2