[contents]
Copyright © 2011 W3C ® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use rules apply.
This document captures outstanding issues in the Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema, Working Draft of 29 October, 2009. The Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) intends to address these issues in future working drafts. Comments and feedback welcome to public-earl10-comments@w3.org.
Previous lists: 23 March 2007, 27 September 2006.
[CLOSED] - change FOAF namespace from http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/# to http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ (from Johannes Koch on 9 Dec 2009).
Resolution: accepted (see related thread).
[PENDING] - "Providing both subclasses an instances" -> "... classes and instances" (from Christophe Strobbe on 8 Apr 2011).
Resolution: accept editorial change.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
[CLOSED] - clarify the target audience, in particular the type of developers (from Christophe Strobbe on 8 Apr 2011).
Resolution: align wording, considering that the conformance section has been moved out of this specification.
[CLOSED] - change FOAF namespace from http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/# to http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ (from Johannes Koch on 9 Dec 2009).
Resolution: accepted (see related thread).
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
[CLOSED] - "Success Criteria 1.1.1 of..." -> "Success Criterion 1.1.1 of..." (from Christophe Strobbe on 8 Apr 2011).
Resolution: accept editorial change.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
[CLOSED] - foaf:mbox: "...the respnsible assertor" -> "... the responsible assertor" (from Christophe Strobbe on 8 Apr 2011).
Resolution: accept editorial change.
[CLOSED] - clarify the example of casting earl:Software onto foaf:Agent or consider using different approach (from Christophe Strobbe on 8 Apr 2011).
Resolution: add a brief note with pointer to RDF Primer or similar.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
[CLOSED] - clarify the use of URIs to identify local files (from Christophe Strobbe on 8 Apr 2011).
Resolution: comment withdrawn.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
[CLOSED] - clarify the use of URIs to identify local files (from Christophe Strobbe on 8 Apr 2011).
Resolution: comment withdrawn.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
[CLOSED] - add an example to show the use of this class and properties (from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 10 Dec 2009).
Resolution: accepted (see related thread) - editor to provide example for review.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
[CLOSED] - make use of DOAP vocabulary.
Resolution: make earl:Software a subclass of doap:Project (see minutes of 27 April 2011).
[CLOSED] - incorrect use of "dct:hasVersion" (from Pete Johnston on 3 Nove 2009).
Resolution: moot due to reuse of DOAP.
[CLOSED] - incorrect use of "dct:hasVersion" (from Pete Johnston on 3 Nove 2009).Resolution: moot due to reuse of DOAP.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
This section will be moved to the "Developer Guide for EARL 1.0" (previously EARL 1.0 Guide) - see Open Issues for EARL 1.0 Guide
[MOVED] - consider separating semantic definitions from conformance constraints (from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 10 Dec 2009).
Status: moved to Open Issues for EARL 1.0 Guide.
[MOVED] - avoid use of MUST/SHOULD keywords (from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 10 Dec 2009).
Status: moved to Open Issues for EARL 1.0 Guide.
[MOVED] - use OWL constrains for machine-readable modelling (from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 10 Dec 2009).
Status: moved to Open Issues for EARL 1.0 Guide.
[MOVED] - avoid requiring other serializations, especially without listing them (from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 10 Dec 2009).
Status: moved to Open Issues for EARL 1.0 Guide.
[MOVED] - requiring producers to generate all known information is unreasonable (from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 10 Dec 2009).
Status: moved to Open Issues for EARL 1.0 Guide.
[MOVED] - definition for consumers is vague (from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 10 Dec 2009).
Status: moved to Open Issues for EARL 1.0 Guide.
[HOLD] - incorrect use of "dct:hasVersion" (from Pete Johnston on 3 Nove 2009).
Status: wait until reuse of DOAP has been settled.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.
The are currently no open issues for this section of the document.