W3C - WAP Forum Coordination Group Charter
Status of this document:
This document was reviewed by the W3C Director and domain leaders, July 21,
1999.
It was sent for review to the WAP Specification Committee and Executive Committee
on August 18, 1999.
It was sent for review to the W3C Advisory Committee members on August 19,
1999.
It was approved by the W3C Director and the WAP Forum Board on November 30.
Changes resulting from the review are included.
Table of Contents
-
Background
-
Mission statement
-
Scope of Activities
-
W3C groups with WAP dependencies
-
WAP Forum groups with W3C dependencies
-
Expected Duration
-
Participants
-
Appointment of Chair
-
Meetings and
teleconferences
-
Voting mechanisms
-
Escalation and dispute resolution
-
Communication Mechanisms
-
Group Home Page
-
Mailing List
-
Support by the W3C Staff
This group was formed to formalize the relationship begun with the introductory
meeting in June 1998, described in the W3C Note
"WAP Forum - W3C Cooperation White
Paper". It is formed within the WAP Forum process, and within the
W3C Process.
The group will:
-
Maintain and develop consistency between the specifications of the WAP Forum
and the W3C.
-
Enable cooperation between the working groups, interest groups, and expert
groups in the WAP Forum and the W3C.
The purpose of this group is to identify technical areas where different
working groups in the W3C and drafting committees in the WAP Forum may overlap,
and to coordinate their work.
The group is also the forum where logistics and procedure issues of common
interest can be discussed and coordinated. Such issues include:
-
Common process of producing specifications: PostScript file, hardcopy
distribution, announcements
-
Implementation, testing
-
Promotion and Dissemination: coordinating press activities and statements
- speaking opportunities - announcements - supplementary documentation -
activity statements
-
Planning activities and meetings
-
Monitoring dependencies between working groups
-
Organizing review of specification or requirement documents
The group will:
-
Make available all information pertinent to the joint effort.
-
Ensure the confidentiality of this information where relevant.
-
Ensure the disclosure of any IPR claims related to the joint effort.
-
Coordinate all public statements and press releases related to the joint
effort.
-
Maintain the WAP Forum - W3C Cooperation
white paper as an architecture document for convergence.
The coordination efforts include, but are not limited to, the following Working
Groups, Coordination Groups, Expert Groups and Interest Groups:
The W3C is organised in Working Groups, which develop specifications. The
Working Groups are associated with Interest Groups, where the work can be
discussed. Coordination Groups provide for coordination between Working Groups.
-
Cascading Style Sheets and Formatting
Properties (CSS&FP) Working Group
-
Following the release of CSS2 as a W3C Recommendation, this Working Group
seeks to extend and enhance CSS to provide greater accessibility, reusability,
device independence and descriptive power for authors and users, and to track
and maintain CSS implementations. The CSS&FP WG cooperates with the XSL
WG to develop a joint formatting model. The current style sheet specifications
contain provisions for a media type that is very similar to the client devices
in the WAP technology, and the WAP forum has expressed interest in seeing
how this could be developed further in the W3C formatting model.
-
HTML Working Group
-
This working group develops XHTML, the next generation of HTML as a suite
of XML tag sets with a clean migration path from HTML 4.0. The WAP Forum
has stated its goals to converge with XHTML.
-
Hypertext Coordination Group
-
The Hypertext Coordination Group coordinates the markup language related
activities in the W3C. As the WAP Forum has designed an XML-based markup
language, coordination of the future convergence with XHTML and other related
issues should be discussed here.
-
Extensible Stylesheet Language (XSL) Working
Group
-
The XSL Working Group is chartered to specify a style sheet language for
XML and other structured markup languages. The XSL WG cooperates with the
CSS&FP WG to develop a joint formatting model. The current style sheet
specifications contain provisions for a media type that is very similar to
the client devices in the WAP technology, and the WAP forum has expressed
interest in seeing how this could be developed further in the W3C formatting
model.
-
Document Object Model (DOM) Working
Group
-
The goal of this Working Group is to define an applications programming interface
that allows active manipulation of the structure, presentation and content
of documents. The WAP Forum has a scripting language which has functions
similar to DOM, and its markup language contains elements which are similar
to DOM.
-
Internationalization (I18N) Working Group
-
The goal of the I18N WG is to propose and coordinate any techniques, conventions,
guidelines and activities within W3C that can help to make the Web more
international. The WAP Forum is very active in enabling the use of WAP in
countries that do not use the Latin-1 character set.
-
Metadata Coordination Group
-
This group manages dependencies between metadata-related groups in the W3C.
This responsibility could easily be extended to the WAP Forum, should that
organisation start concerning itself with metadata issues.
-
Mobile Access Interest Group
-
The purpose of this IG is to provide a forum for Members to discuss issues
related to mobile Web access. The goal of this IG is to establish WG(s) for
mobile access guidelines and/or specifications, or to describe guidelines
within the IG itself. This working group has a natural position as a "first
stop" for the W3C in the initiation of activities in the mobile area, before
or conjunctionally with approaching the WAP Forum.
-
P3P Coordination Working
Group
-
Privacy is one of the most contentious issues on the web, and likely to be
so in the mobile area, too. The P3P Coordination Working Group coordinates
the work between the P3P Working Groups, and could serve the same purpouse
visavis the WAP Forum.
-
Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Working Group
-
The working group is chartered to produce a specification for an SVG format,
written as a modular XML tagset and usable as an XML namespace, which can
be widely implemented in browsers and authoring tools and which is suitable
for widespread adoption by the content authoring community as a replacement
for many current uses of raster graphics. The WAP Forum is currently
investigating other graphics formats than WBMP, which is a one-bit bitmap
format.
-
Synchronized Multimedia (SYMM) Interest
Group
-
This Interest Group is chartered as a discussion forum for preparing future
work on the SMIL specification itself, as a forum to discuss integration
of SMIL with other W3C Recommendations and as a forum for maintaining the
SMIL 1.0 specification. The Multimedia Expert Group in the WAP Forum has
already established a working relationship with this group.
-
Synchronized Multimedia (SYMM)
Working Group
-
This Working Group is chartered to develop the new version of SMIL, the
Synchronised Multimedia Integration Language. The Multimedia Expert Group
in the WAP Forum has already established a working relationship with this
group.
-
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Coordination
Group
-
The WAI is in the process of presenting the first version of its specifications.
As work progresses, the WAI should be enabled to review upcoming WAP Forum
specifications through the WAI Coordination Group.
-
XML Coordination Group
-
The XML Coordination Group coordinates the work in the XML Working Groups.
These groups will terminate in the near future, as they are producing their
Proposed Recommendations for standards. The XML Coordination Group will be
the forum for future cooperation and convergence with the XML Working Groups
that may be formed in the future.
-
XML Signatures working group
-
The WAP Forum is quite active in the field of security, and is discussing
signed documents as one of its security mechanism. Coordination with the
XML Signatures working group would facilitate the progress in that field.
The WAP Forum is organised in Working Groups, which appoint Drafting Committees
to design specifications. Expert Groups provide discussion fora for specific
issues.
-
WAP Security Working Group
(WSG)
-
WSG is the working group for security issues in WAP. In WAP, the security
concept covers a relatively long-lived security association between a client
and a server. However, the group has recently started discussing digital
signatures as a possible future mechanism.
-
WAP Applications Working
Group (WAG)
-
The Wireless Applications Working Group (WAG) is chartered with the development
of the Wireless Applications Environment (WAE), the user environment of WAP.
WAG is organized around a number of officially chartered Drafting Committees
and informally organized ad hoc committees. Several of those Drafting Committees
touch upon areas where work is being conducted in the W3C, such as the WML
drafting committee which already works with the HTML WG, and the UAPROF drafting
committee which intends to work with the proposed CC/PP WG.
-
WAP Wireless Protocols
Group (WPG)
-
The Wireless Protocols Group (WPG) is chartered with the development and
maintenance of the WAP Forum protocols. It is organised in three subgroups,
which in themselves consitute working groups: The
Wireless Session
Protocol (WSP) Working Group, the
Wireless Transaction
Protocol (WTP) Working Group, and the
Wireless Datagram
Protocol (WDP) Working Group. To the extent that the W3C develops HTTP
further, these groups are appropriate speaking partners.
-
WAP Architecture Working
Group (Arch)
-
The WAP Architecture Working Group (ArchWG) exists to ensure that current
and future additions to the WAP Architecture are well defined and form a
cohesive whole. There is no corresponding group in the W3C, but all issues
which concern developments outside the current WAP specifications should
be discussed here.
-
WAP Asian Expert Group
(AEG)
-
The Asian Expert Group (AEG) is a WAP forum Expert Group. The objectives
of AEG are to make requirements for Asian related issues from various view
points and input a joint proposal to the related Working Group in order to
contribute to the expansion of the WAP specification over the Asian region.
This group is very active in the field that touches the W3C I18N group.
-
Marketing and Communications
Experts Group (MCEG)
-
The Marketing and Communications Expert Group (MCEG) is chartered with the
marketing and positioning of WAP technology to all interested constituents
and stakeholders, including network operators, equipment manufacturers, content
and tool developers, end-users, journalists, analysts and WAP Forum members.
All public relations and marketing related issues should be discussed here,
until a policy is established.
-
WAP Telematics Expert Group
(TEG)
-
The Telematics Expert Group is tasked with the responsibility of providing
a window for the WAP Forum to other organization involved in Telematics
activites. The information flow should be used to ensure that WAP resources
are not being used to accomplish Telematics related tasks that have or are
already being addressed by other organizations. At the WAP Forum-W3C joint
meeting on July 2, it was decided that the TEG and the W3C Mobile Access
interest Group should hold a joint workshop around position dependency and
location relevancy.
-
WAP Multimedia Expert Group
(MEG)
-
The WAP Forum Multimedia Expert Group (MEG) is tasked with the responsibility
of coordinating multimedia activities within the WAP Forum. It has already
started to establish a working relationship with the W3C SYMM WG and IG.
This coordination group is expected to last through November 2000. At that
point, a re-evaluation of the group and its activities, as well as the
cooperation and convergence between the two organisations in general,
will be conducted.
Coordination Group participants are appointed by the WAP Forum Specification
Committee and the W3C Director.
The group consists of twelve members, six appointed by the WAP Forum
Specification Committee and six appointed by the W3C Director. Each liaison
may nominate an alternate representative that must be confirmed by the CG
chair. The list of members and alternates is to be published on the CG home
page.
The group chair is appointed for a period of six months from the group
participants, alternately by the W3C and the WAP Forum, with the W3C appointing
the chair initially.
During the first three months of its existence, the group will schedule a
face-to-face meeting. It can then decide to schedule meetings every three
months, should this be required. See also the
W3C Process document,
section 3.2.3 Meetings.
The coordination group holds a bi-weekly one-hour phone conference. The chair
is responsible for producing an agenda at least 24 hours in advance, and
participants are responsible to send regrets to the chair in advance if they
chose not to attend. This also applies to face-to-face meetings.
Before each teleconference, each group member must send to the coordination
group a short report on the activity in the groups he or she represents,
since the previous teleconference.
Minutes from both teleconferences and meetings should be posted on the server
and linked from the home page no later than 24 hours after the conference
or meeting. Minutes should be accessible only by W3C and WAP Forum members.
Minutes should reflect any decisions taken, any actions that are to be conducted
on behalf of the group, and a summary of discussions. That minutes are taken
are the responsibility of the chair, but this may be delegated to one of
the meeting participants.
Consensus is the default rule for this group, and members should recognise
that consensus may involve compromise. In case issues cannot be resolved
in consensus, the chair may call a vote. Voting is by simple majority. Each
member of the group has one vote. In case of a tie, the chair has a breaking
vote. See also the
W3C Process document on voting.
Escalation and dispute resolution
The function of this group is to resolve issues and enable the continued
cooperation and convergence between the WAP and W3C architectures. The group
must make its utmost to resolve any disputes with a solution that is acceptable
to all parties.
If agreement cannot be found between this Coordination Group and other groups
involved, in an issue which potentially would damage the future relations
between the organisations, a request for resolution of the dispute can be
sent to the W3C Director and the CEO of the WAP Forum. Each group member
can send such a request. The Director and the CEO will then resolve the issue.
If the W3C Director and the WAP Forum CEO cannot find an amicable solution
to the dispute, the organisations will agree to disagree.
See also the W3C
Process document on arbitration.
Coordination group members are expected to participate in an electronic mailing
list and periodic teleconferences.
The chair maintains a group web page on the W3C server that allows group
members to share context and provides W3C and WAP Forum membership with access
to the proceedings of the group. This page is accessible only by W3C and
WAP Forum members.
The group maintains a calendar of the most significant events in each coordinated
group, such as face-to-face meetings or release of deliverables. Where possible,
they should be linked from existing calendars.
Participants must subscribe to and participate in the
wapw3c@w3.org
mailing list, responding to issues in a timely
fashion. This list is archived and access reserved to W3C members. A reflector
of the list is archived at the WAP Forum site, making the discussion
archives available to the WAP Forum members. For public discussion,
a list called www-wap@w3.org
is maintained. It is publicly
accessible, and archived in the public area of the W3C web site.
W3C staff provide the working environment for the group. The W3C systems
team maintains web server for the group page as well as the mailing lists
and archives. The W3C administrative team organizes teleconferences and meetings.
The W3C communications team coordinates public relations activities with
its peers in the WAP Forum.
The effort for this is estimated at no more than 5 % of one man year per
work year.
Johan Hjelm