Felix Sasaki email@example.com
These are comments on behalf of the I18N WG.
We recommend that responses to the comments in this table use a separate email for each point. This makes it easier to track threads.
|1||sec. 2.5.1||About pishing||E|
|2||app. A||Versions of XML and XML Namespaces||
You write: "For example: XML 1.1 or HTML documents tied through hypertext reference producing as many DOM linked to one another." What is the relation between versions of XML and XML namespaces in this scenario? E.g what happens, if an XML 1.0 document references an XML 1.1. document? It might be that this depends on the languages being compounded, but you should have general guidelines for (new) languages as well.
|3||app. A||Spelling error||
"A parent document represents a document that has a DOM as defined by DOM Level 3 Core and reference": replace "reference" with "references".
|4||general||General support of IRI||
We propose that you make support for IRI a mandatory feature for CDF by reference. It might be that the possiblity of referencing IRI depends on the languages being compounded, but you should have general guidelines for (new) languages as well.
|5||general||Language identification for child documents||
If you ask an SVG document about language information, and the document is inside an HTML document, the xml:lang attribute in the HTML applies to the SVG as well. It seems that the compounding specs should say: "You should get the same results for both inclusion and referencel."
Version: $Id: Overview.html,v 1.4 2006/01/25 12:53:28 fsasaki Exp $