ISSUE-109: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages

Indic languages - disambiguation

disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages

State:

CLOSED

Product:

MLW-LT Standard Draft

Raised by:

David Lewis

Opened on:

2013-01-21

Description:

See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0055.html

Addresses specific requirements for disambiguation in Indic languages. Other comments Indic language considerations for translation and LocNote handled in separate issues.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Review of issues 100-120 (from jirka@kosek.cz on 2013-04-08)
2. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2013-02-20)
3. Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from schandra@deity.gov.in on 2013-02-18)
4. Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-18)
5. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-12)
6. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
7. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-11 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
8. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-11)
9. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-07)
10. Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-03)
11. Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from shaunm@gnome.org on 2013-01-28)
12. RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
13. New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
14. [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-28)
15. Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
16. [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
17. Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-22)
18. Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-01-21 and "sheperds" ... (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
19. Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-21)
20. mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-109 (Indic languages - disambiguation): disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-21)

Related notes:

Display change log