W3C

- DRAFT -

WebCGM
28 Sep 2006

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Dave, Lofton, Don, Benoit, Thierry, Al, Dieter (on IRC only)
Regrets
Dieter, Stuart
Chair
lofton
Scribe
dave

Contents


 

scribe dave

<scribe> scribe: dave

<lofton> chair: lofton

Last weeks minutes: hhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0064.html

roll call

roll call done

routine WG business

none

WAI appendix

<lofton> (switch order of agenda #3 and #4)

<lofton> appendix E: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2006/wai-appendix-V3.html

LH: generated styling section for appendix and added to draft
... generally a positive feedback

AL: substance of appendix, no problems other than 2 wording issues

LH: response to Kentarou concerning implementations vs viewers

AL: should say viewers instead of implementations

LH: we will change implemtations to viewers in text

AL: in note change at end of E.3. second sentence is not properly worded

LH: not the design intent of name attribute - change

Al: appendix accepted with those changes

lofton: proposal that WebCGM WG approve appendix [2] for inclusion in PR text

objections?

unanimous, approved

<DW> no objection

LH: thanks to Al and WAI PF folks for their contribution

<thierry> do you see me

AL: expresses thanks to WG for considering their late comments

Should WG reply to CDF?

<lofton> yes thierry, you're there in IRC, as well as Zakim monitor

LH: relationship to CDF, material in LC draft in Dec, disappeared in more recent drafts
... Asked CDF about missing text

<lofton> CDF reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0071.html

LH: CDF did reply
... should we respond to their reply?
... way forward - thank CDF committee for their response and agree that publication somewhere else would be useful
... ask Chris whether he wants to take this forward to another arena

<scribe> ACTION: lofton to check with Chris on this topic [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-26 - Check with Chris on this topic [on Lofton Henderson - due 2006-10-05].

<scribe> ACTION: lofton to respond to CDF [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-27 - Respond to CDF [on Lofton Henderson - due 2006-10-05].

Press Release and Testimonials

Come next week with ideas for testimonials and press releases

<DW> ITEDO is working on both testimonial and press release

<scribe> ACTION: thierry to check whether testimonials can only come from W3C (or WG) members [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-28 - Check whether testimonials can only come from W3C (or WG) members [on Thierry Michel - due 2006-10-05].

<scribe> ACTION: dave to pursue testimonial from S1000D, if permissible [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-29 - Pursue testimonial from S1000D, if permissible [on David Cruikshank - due 2006-10-05].

<scribe> ACTION: don to check with testimonial from PTC [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-30 - Check with testimonial from PTC [on Don Larson - due 2006-10-05].

<scribe> ACTION: dieter to report next week on plans [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action06]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-31 - Report next week on plans [on Dieter Weidenbruck - due 2006-10-05].

During CR & moving to PR

LH: given where we are now, I would like to propose that at the next week telecon we vote for transition to PR

TM: already drafted cover page for PR document

<lofton> draft pr cover page: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/thierry-editor/Overview-PR.html

LH: we plan to vote next week to advance to PR (Oct 5), based on no further comments by Oct 6
... all must make an effort to be at the telecon next week

DL: will not be available for telecon next week, but he can indicate his vote via email before the meeting

TM: we need to have an updated editors version to vote on.

LH: intented to do that and link will be in agenda published Wed AM, Don can respond to agenda with his vote

<scribe> ACTION: lofton to publish candidate PR text by Wed AM [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action07]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-32 - Publish candidate PR text by Wed AM [on Lofton Henderson - due 2006-10-05].

TM: need note any changes during CR (WAI appendix and 2 way references)

LH: patent exclusion issue resolved

TM: thanks for all the WG members and AC reps for being quick on responding
... If a new member joins before we enter PR, then that member will have to also exclude patent
... exclusion period will not end until we enter PR

LH: the exclusion period end when the director approved entering PR

<lofton> at risk: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0080.html

LH: we are ok, except possibly Text on Path
... we have a question out to SDI on whether he will finish implementation
... how do we handle feature at risk, if it is not implemented at entry to PR

TM: check with director on his feeling
... we might slide entry to PR a week to accomadate Text on Path

<scribe> ACTION: dave to continue to follow up on Text on Path [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action08]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-33 - Continue to follow up on Text on Path [on David Cruikshank - due 2006-10-05].

<lofton> http://www.w3.org/2006/Graphics/WebCGM/implementation-report.html

LH: preliminary implementation report needs to be final before director's meeting

<scribe> ACTION: lofton to finalize implementation report prior to next meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action09]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-34 - Finalize implementation report prior to next meeting [on Lofton Henderson - due 2006-10-05].

<scribe> ACTION: thierry to take on editing of final implementation report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action10]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-35 - Take on editing of final implementation report [on Thierry Michel - due 2006-10-05].

<scribe> ACTION: lofton to update matrix to reflect latest results [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action11]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-36 - Update matrix to reflect latest results [on Lofton Henderson - due 2006-10-05].

LH: publication of test suite needs to get done - update to release 1.0 and possibly update a few of the test results
... what is critical timing on publication?

TM: test suite is changable, so timing in not critical

LH: goal of publishing release 1.0 of test suite in two weeks
... for steps to make PR transition look a lot like steps from CR transition

TM: he will handle most of the steps
... in transition request he will point out our work with WAI

LH: what happens after PR? - MOU between W3C and OASIS indicates that when we enter PR we can start working in OASIS again
... when PR transition is approved, we will enter a second CS ballot (15 days) in OASIS
... How long does PR last in W3C

TM: 4 week review by W3C members and them some few days to publish

LH: we need final steps of W3C and OASIS to occur at the same time
... what happens after PR finishes

TM: spec is frozen and cover page indicates "rec" and final uri is updated

LH: we will work out details on the next few weeks on timing

end of agenda

LH: meeting adjourned

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: dave to continue to follow up on Text on Path [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action08]
[NEW] ACTION: dave to pursue testimonial from S1000D, if permissible [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: dieter to report next week on plans [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action06]
[NEW] ACTION: don to check with testimonial from PTC [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action05]
[NEW] ACTION: lofton to check with Chris on this topic [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: lofton to finalize implementation report prior to next meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action09]
[NEW] ACTION: lofton to publish candidate proposed pr text by Wed AM [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: lofton to respond to CDF [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: lofton to update matrix to reflect latest results [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action11]
[NEW] ACTION: thierry to check whether testimonials can only come from W3C (or WG) members [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: thierry to take on editing of final implementation report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html#action10]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.127 (CVS log)
$Date: 2006/09/28 17:00:02 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127  of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: dave
Inferring ScribeNick: dave

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Al AlGilman BB BenoitB DL DW Dave_Cruikshank Don Don_Larson LH Lofton_Henderson Minutes TM Zakiim dave lofton thierry tmichel tmichel_ trackbot
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Regrets: Dieter Stuart
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0093.html
Got date from IRC log name: 28 Sep 2006
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2006/09/28-webcgm-minutes.html
People with action items: dave dieter don lofton thierry

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.
[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]