<thierry> I am a little late on another call. Will be there in a few minutes

Scribe Dave

<scribe> Scribe: Dave

Meetiing: WebCGM teleconf

Previous Minutes: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2008/11/20-webcgm-minutes.html

Roll Call

Al Gilman questions & remarks

See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0023.html

Carry forward until Dec 18

LC Review completion and DoC

Resolved: close current DoC with agreements made and handle future comments via a 2nd cycle

We should have a disposition of comments document within 2 weeks and have our reponses ready to go back to commenters

<lofton> reference #10: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Dec/0002.html

Proposed resolution for gzip - create requirement that 2.1 interpreters handle gzip compressed valid content, as opposed to gzip as an encoding

Resolved: Approved resolution as described in part 1 of reference 10

<lofton> (That requirement would be only in Ch.7, and current gzip wording is to be removed from Ch.6)

Loose end involved here is that a 2.1 interpreter does not necessarily have to handle gzipped 1.0 or 2.0 WebCGM files.

<lofton> (See "Part 2" of agenda reference #10)

<lofton> Dave gives scenario that supports the use case -- 2.1 viewers that claim backward compatibility to 1.0 and/or 2.0 should correctly handle 1.0/2.0 instances that are gzip compressed.

<lofton> what I'm hearing: all present support that.

Dave and Don will provide responses to part 2 of agenda reference #10

I18N comments

Remaining open questions concern question of character set (latin1) and normalization

Those are issues 5 and 6 in reference #7

See reference #7 http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0811-webcgm/

Everyone agrees that normalization is required for potential fonts ourside the "Abobe 13".

<scribe> ACTION: on issue 5 Lofton to propose final resolution [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/04-webcgm-minutes.html#action01]

Lofton has invited a member from I18N to discuss our response. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Dec/0010.html

Other new threads

'locus' defn to glossary

Resolution: approve reference #11

[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0062.html

Resolution: Approved wording dealing with setView() rectangles with different aspect ratios

This issue will be recorded as DoC 12

<lofton> what about: "setView() invalid or extreme rectangle"?

<lofton> Did it fall through the cracks?

<lofton> (This is the second subissue of the setView(), as in reference #3...

<lofton> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0036.html

setView() invalid or extreme rectangle

<scribe> ACTION: Dave, Don, Stuart reply to new thread to be created by Lofton on invalid rectangle [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/04-webcgm-minutes.html#action02]

Status & Forecast for test suite and implementations

We will not be assured of having a productive meeting the end of January.

It will probably slip at least 4-8 weeks

Thierry proposes that we consider March for f2f to correspond to March milestone of publish CR

Next teleonference in 2 weeks (Dec 18th)

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Loose/Loose end/
Succeeded: s/11/12/
Found Scribe: Dave
Inferring ScribeNick: Dave
Present: Dave Don Lofton Stuart Thierry
Regrets: Dieter
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Dec/0016.html
Got date from IRC log name: 04 Dec 2008
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/12/04-webcgm-minutes.html

WARNING: No person found for ACTION item: on #5 lofton to propose final resolution [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/04-webcgm-minutes.html#action01]

People with action items: dave don reply stuart

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.