ISSUE-2088
no-color-interpolation
Painting chapter mentions optional color interpolation space, which is not described anywhere
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SVG 1.2 Tiny: Last Call
- Raised by:
- Cameron McCormack
- Opened on:
- 2008-10-03
- Description:
(noted by JonCruz in #svg) The very last sentence of the Painting chapter says: Optionally other color profiles may be provided to specify an alternative interpolation color space. but nowhere is it defined how this optional feature works. It should probably be removed.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Color Interpolation Space (ISSUE-2088) (from schepers@w3.org on 2008-11-03)
- Re: Color Interpolation Space (ISSUE-2088) (from jon@joncruz.org on 2008-11-03)
- Color Interpolation Space (ISSUE-2088) (from schepers@w3.org on 2008-11-02)
- SVG/profiles/1.2T doc-svgt12.html,1.2,1.3 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2008-10-30)
- Re: ISSUE-2088 (no-color-interpolation): Painting chapter mentions optional color interpolation space, which is not described anywhere [SVG Tiny 1.2] (from cam@mcc.id.au on 2008-10-30)
- Re: ISSUE-2088 (no-color-interpolation): Painting chapter mentions optional color interpolation space, which is not described anywhere [SVG Tiny 1.2] (from cam@mcc.id.au on 2008-10-30)
- SVG/profiles/1.2T/master painting.html,1.131,1.132 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2008-10-30)
- Re: ISSUE-2088 (no-color-interpolation): Painting chapter mentions optional color interpolation space, which is not described anywhere [SVG Tiny 1.2] (from chris@w3.org on 2008-10-28)
- Minutes, October 28, 2008 telcon (from ed@opera.com on 2008-10-28)
- Re: ISSUE-2088 (no-color-interpolation): Painting chapter mentions optional color interpolation space, which is not described anywhere [SVG Tiny 1.2] (from cam@mcc.id.au on 2008-10-28)
- ISSUE-2088 (no-color-interpolation): Painting chapter mentions optional color interpolation space, which is not described anywhere [SVG Tiny 1.2] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-10-03)
Related notes:
2008-11-02 20:58:43: Agree. [Doug Schepers]
2008-11-04 03:47:05: Agree, removed reference, will revisit in SVG 2.0 Core. Commenter satisfied: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Nov/0043.html [Doug Schepers]
Display change log
