This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 991 - Editorial decisions from June F2F (010)
Summary: Editorial decisions from June F2F (010)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: QA
Classification: Unclassified
Component: QASpec-GL (show other bugs)
Version: LC-2004-11-22
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Karl Dubost
QA Contact: Karl Dubost
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: LC, SpecGL
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-01-10 04:20 UTC by Karl Dubost
Modified: 2005-04-28 11:53 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Karl Dubost 2005-01-10 04:20:45 UTC 
Glancing quickly through the QA June F2F minutes and comparing it with the QA Specification 
Guidelines, it appears that most of the decisions we took wrt editorial comments for SpecGL haven't 
been implemented in the text yet; so, one of the issues that needs to be solved before going to last call 
is to actually implement them.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Jun/0044.html

Comment


Dom has precised in an additional email the nature of the comments which have been forgotten. This 
mail includes:


Remove the RFC Keywords.

Meaningful and clear sentences for Good Practices and Principles.

Why Care of section A.1.




Proposal


Karl has proposed the following resolutions:

Todo: Remove the RFC Keywords.
Meaningful and clear sentences... See Issue 11
Editorial revision of all "Why Care". See Issue 12

Closed
Comment 1 Dominique Hazael-Massieux 2005-04-28 11:53:50 UTC 
setting version to LC in case of future use