This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 9836 - The working group should consider all of a response, not just the first five words, to determine its meaning.
Summary: The working group should consider all of a response, not just the first five ...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: working group Decision Policy (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: This bug has no owner yet - up for the taking
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-06-02 21:15 UTC by Larry Masinter
Modified: 2010-06-03 00:25 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Larry Masinter 2010-06-02 21:15:39 UTC 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0027.html

The decision about which objections are strong or are not strong should be working group consensus based. Even if the chairs are making this decision, the chairs should at least read the whole argument and not the first few words out of context.
Comment 1 Larry Masinter 2010-06-03 00:01:02 UTC 
Never mind. It would have been nice to actually had my opinion considered, but I think it's a lost cause.
Comment 2 Sam Ruby 2010-06-03 00:25:50 UTC 
If you are referring to your input to the WBS surveys on issues 90 and 91, then your words were most definitely read in full and considered.  But since both you and Shelley have inquired on this, I've provided more detail:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0035.html