This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 9691 - [DM11] incorrect labels, for type hierarchy diagrams (minor editorial corrections)
Summary: [DM11] incorrect labels, for type hierarchy diagrams (minor editorial correct...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Data Model 3.0 (show other bugs)
Version: Working drafts
Hardware: All All
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Norman Walsh
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel-11/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-05-09 02:51 UTC by Mukul Gandhi
Modified: 2010-05-14 01:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Mukul Gandhi 2010-05-09 02:51:05 UTC 
In the type hierarchy diagrams at, http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel-11/#types-hierarchy, the "part 1" & "part 2" diagrams are labelled as, "XPath 2.0 and XQuery 1.0". Whereas, "part 3" diagram is labelled as, "XPath 2.1 and XQuery 1.1".

I think, "part 1" & "part 2" diagrams also need to be labelled as, "XPath 2.1 and XQuery 1.1".

Regards,
Mukul
Comment 1 Norman Walsh 2010-05-11 15:06:55 UTC 
I will make this editorial change.
Comment 2 Jim Melton 2010-05-13 21:50:34 UTC 
And I beat Norm to it :)  The changes have been made to the originals and the PNG versions of the two diagrams and checked in.  As a result of those changes, I've marked this bug RESOLVED/FIXED.  If you trust that I've done so, please mark the bug CLOSED; otherwise, please remember to mark the bug CLOSED when the document is republished in the relatively near future and you verify that the diagrams have been updated.
Comment 3 Mukul Gandhi 2010-05-14 01:20:59 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> And I beat Norm to it :)  The changes have been made to the originals and the
> PNG versions of the two diagrams and checked in.  As a result of those changes,
> I've marked this bug RESOLVED/FIXED.  If you trust that I've done so, please
> mark the bug CLOSED; otherwise, please remember to mark the bug CLOSED when the
> document is republished in the relatively near future and you verify that the
> diagrams have been updated.

Thanks, Jim.

I think, it'll be appropriate for me (if you're asking me to close this bug :)) to close the bug, after we see the changes in the next published version.

Regards,
Mukul