This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> I am not sure whether I miss something, but it seems most examples are not well-formed XML, for example section 2.4.6 has [...] guard="cdl:isVariableAvailable( cdl:getVariable("POAcknowledgement"), "", "", "tns:Customer")" [...] The quote marks are not properly balanced. Please either make these examples well-formed XML or explain in the document why they are not well-formed.
From meeting on 11-jan-05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0002/2005-01- 11_WS-Chor_Notes.txt: Editorial - check all the XML fragments
Note that the XML fragments are not going to be well-formed in the strict sense as we have included the ? + * symbols of our informal notation. In the example quoted the inverted commas are in fact balanced in terms of number so I think he is complaining about not being balanced in the 66 - 99 sense (there are in fact several different characters that one can use for inverted commas. I have changed them for "unisex quotation marks" like these! I have turned off the replace straight quotes with smart quotes autoformat options so please do not turn on again or all our quotes may going 'sloping' again!
Bjoern has been informed of the group's resolution to this issue [1]. changed to closed, and awaiting confirmation. [1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0000.html
Bjoern has confirmed he is happy with the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0012.html