This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 9307 - I think the darker composite operation should be reintroduced. http://ajaxian.com/archives/harmony-canvas-drawing-tool for example.
Summary: I think the darker composite operation should be reintroduced. http://ajaxian...
Status: RESOLVED NEEDSINFO
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pre-LC1 HTML Canvas 2D Context (editor: Ian Hickson) (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement
Target Milestone: LC
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard: canvas RFE
Keywords:
: 9308 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-03-24 17:02 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2012-02-29 22:41 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2010-03-24 17:02:06 UTC 
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#compositing

Comment:
I think the darker composite operation should be reintroduced.
http://ajaxian.com/archives/harmony-canvas-drawing-tool for example.

Posted from: 80.218.156.158
Comment 1 Ms2ger 2010-03-24 19:22:09 UTC 
*** Bug 9308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-04-02 01:36:56 UTC 
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: It was excluded because nobody could agree on what operation it corresponded to. At this point, I think we should wait until we've gotten a more reliable and interoperable implementation of the existing API before adding new features again. Baby steps and all.
Comment 3 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-02-29 00:35:10 UTC 
To add this, we need a precise description of what it is.
Comment 4 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-02-29 20:43:52 UTC 
See also bug 14579.
Comment 5 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-02-29 22:41:02 UTC 
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Did Not Understand Request
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: see comment 3