This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 8988 - Extensions to HTML5 syntax should be described as extensions, not modifications
Summary: Extensions to HTML5 syntax should be described as extensions, not modifications
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LC1 HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny) (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Manu Sporny
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/#extensi...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-02-14 07:15 UTC by Maciej Stachowiak
Modified: 2011-08-04 05:06 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Maciej Stachowiak 2010-02-14 07:15:36 UTC 
"There are a few changes that are required to the HTML5 specification in order to fully support RDFa. The following sub-sections outline the necessary modifications to the base HTML5 specification."

The additions to the HTML5 syntax should be described as "extensions", not "modifiations".
Comment 1 Manu Sporny 2010-02-16 04:27:44 UTC 
RDFA-SPEC-SECTIONS [extensions-to-the-html5-syntax]
Comment 2 Manu Sporny 2010-05-05 02:15:07 UTC 
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Fixed

Change Description: 

Changed all instances of "modifications" to "extensions" in the document.

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100504/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.4&r2=1.5&f=h

Rationale:

"Extensions" is less politically charged than "modifications".
Comment 3 Michael[tm] Smith 2011-08-04 05:06:14 UTC 
mass-move component to LC1