This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 8934 - The Atom specification example could be rewritten as: "For example, the Atom specification defines a content element. When its type element has the value xhtml, the specification requires that it contain a single HTML div element. Thus ..."
Summary: The Atom specification example could be rewritten as: "For example, the Atom ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: LC
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 8935 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-02-10 10:37 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2010-10-04 14:31 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2010-02-10 10:37:10 UTC 
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#content-models

Comment:
The Atom specification example could be rewritten as: "For example, the Atom
specification defines a content element. When its type element has the value
xhtml, the specification requires that it contain a single HTML div element.
Thus ..."

Posted from: 64.134.222.102
Comment 1 Maciej Stachowiak 2010-02-14 07:59:23 UTC 
*** Bug 8935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-02-18 03:29:26 UTC 
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: I guess that makes it a bit more readable.
Comment 3 contributor 2010-02-18 03:30:14 UTC 
Checked in as WHATWG revision r4776.
Check-in comment: readability
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4775&to=4776