This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 8560 - Define HTMLElement.style as ElementCSSInlineStyle.style (CSSOM)? [ms]
Summary: Define HTMLElement.style as ElementCSSInlineStyle.style (CSSOM)? [ms]
Status: RESOLVED NEEDSINFO
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: LC
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-12-27 11:17 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2010-10-04 13:59 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description contributor 2009-12-27 11:17:42 UTC
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#elements-in-the-dom

Comment:
Define HTMLElement.style as ElementCSSInlineStyle.style (CSSOM)? [ms]

Posted from: 91.176.240.171
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-01-11 04:42:57 UTC
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Did Not Understand Request
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: Anne, do you have any opinion on this?
Comment 2 Anne 2010-01-31 23:30:06 UTC
Originally this used to be in DOM Level 2 Style as "ElementCSSInlineStyle" but since it is a content attribute it does make somewhat more sense to be in the HTML specification I think, though the line is blurry.

Let me be constructive and say that it royally sucks we have three markup language specifications with a style attribute, a CSS specification defining the concept of the style attribute which the markup languages are supposed to use (though it just went to Last Call and the markup languages existed like forever), the markup languages defining part of the DOM interface because the CSS specification does not touch that, and the CSSOM defining some more of the DOM interface. Yay for modularity I guess.