Here is the email reproduced for convenience: 
I read through the latest working draft  
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-P3P11-20040427/ and found a number of  
minor errors that need to be fixed: 
 
1.1.1 The list of enhancements is incomplete. It also needs to include: 
- An optional element for declaring the jurisdiction of data recipients 
- Definitions of identified, identifiable, linked, and linkable data 
- An optional element for declaring domain relationships 
- A compact version of the STATEMENT element for use in compact policies 
 
It would also be good to list the relevant sections for all of these  
items 
 
1.3 change reference to my book to a reference in the non-normative  
references appendix 
 
1.3.1 last sentence, there is a quoted phrase at the end of the  
sentence - remove quotes and italicize instead. 
 
2.3.2.7 In first sentence of paragraph hyperlink "linked" to 1.3.4 
 
2.3.2.9 
 
The section about Domain Relationships --> This section 
 
modifications would allow --> modifications allow 
 
change hyperlink to issues to a reference in the non-normative  
references appendix 
 
2.3.2.9.1 extension element to --> extension to 
 
the extension needs an xmlns (in BNF and examples) 
 
2.3.2.9.3 when only using --> when using 
 
2.5 This doesn't appear to reflect the changes I proposed in my April 9  
email 
 
3.2.3 required. or mixed. --> required or mixed. 
 
3.3.2 one implementers authoring --> one implementer's authoring 
 
3.3.6.1 need xmlns attribute and long and short description in BNF and  
examples 
 
4 strike first paragraph (repeated in second paragraph) 
 
4.7 Add: See Section 6.4 for guidelines designed to reduce the chance  
that a P3P user agent will accept an invalid compact policy. 
 
6.2 are available at ??? --> will be posted on the W3C web site when  
they become available. 
 
remove the . at the end of the money definition 
 
add the CATEGORIES label to the first column of demographic 
 
CATEGORIES optional -- the wording here is stated as "the data element"  
but I think "this data" would make more sense... I wasn't involved in  
this discussion 
 
Appendix 9 - add P3P 1.1 working group contributors in a new paragraph  
at the beginning 
 
Changelog - spell check, I see a bunch of typos 
 
 
Also we need to add the following (basically a summary of our backwards  
compatibility guidelines documenting that we followed them): 
 
1.1.7 Backwards Compatibility 
 
P3P 1.1 has been designed so that P3P 1.0 user agents can process P3P  
1.1 policies and  policy reference files. This implies both that the  
P3P 1.1 policies and  policy reference files are fully compliant with  
the P3P 1.0 XML schema,  and that the semantics of these files will not  
be misinterpreted by a  user agent that interprets them according to  
the P3P 1.0  specification. All new syntax introduced in P3P 1.1 has  
been introduced as optional extensions using the P3P 1.0 extension   
mechanism. Changes to requirements or definitions introduced in P3P 1.1  
add clarity where the P3P 1.0 specification is ambiguous, but do not   
cause a particular P3P vocabulary element to have different meanings in  
  P3P 1.0 and P3P 1.1. In addition, some new requirements or features  
have been introduced in the P3P 1.1  specification that do not impact  
the ability of P3P 1.0 user agents to  process P3P 1.1 policies and  
policy reference files.