This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 7197 - Frag: check 2119 terms
Summary: Frag: check 2119 terms
Status: CLOSED REMIND
Alias: None
Product: WS-Resource Access
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ResourceTransfer (show other bugs)
Version: FPWD
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Doug Davis
QA Contact: notifications mailing list for WS Resource Access
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: hasProposal
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-02 23:41 UTC by Doug Davis
Modified: 2009-12-09 09:32 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Doug Davis 2009-08-02 23:41:06 UTC
just so I don't forget, the use of lower-case 2119 terms in
the current ws-frag need to be checked:

Index: wsfrag.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsfrag.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 wsfrag.xml
--- wsfrag.xml  2 Aug 2009 01:46:18 -0000       1.1
+++ wsfrag.xml  2 Aug 2009 23:39:15 -0000
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
    <p>This is the First Public Working Draft.</p>
    <p>
     Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the
-    W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced
+    W3C Membership. This is a draft document and can be updated, replaced
     or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to
     cite this document as other than work in progress.
    </p>
@@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@

     <p>
      A normative copy of the XML Schema <bibref ref='XmlSchemaPart1'/>,
-     <bibref ref='XmlSchemaPart2'/> description for this specification may be
+     <bibref ref='XmlSchemaPart2'/> description for this specification can be
      retrieved from the following address:
     </p>

@@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@
     <head>WSDL</head>
     <p>
      A normative copy of the WSDL <bibref ref="Wsdl11"/> description
-     for this specification may be retrieved from the following address:
+     for this specification can be retrieved from the following address:
     </p>
Comment 1 Robert Freund 2009-08-18 21:06:34 UTC
resolved as proposed