This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 6587 - RA: Consistent text for 'Notational Conventions'
Summary: RA: Consistent text for 'Notational Conventions'
Status: CLOSED REMIND
Alias: None
Product: WS-Resource Access
Classification: Unclassified
Component: All (show other bugs)
Version: FPWD
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: notifications mailing list for WS Resource Access
QA Contact: notifications mailing list for WS Resource Access
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-02-16 13:05 UTC by Katy Warr
Modified: 2015-06-20 16:35 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Katy Warr 2009-02-16 13:05:14 UTC
Ensure 'Notational Conventions' text is consistent across all of the ws-ra specs.

Already highlighted is different wrt Ellipses (but other aspect of this section should be checked):

An ellipsis (i.e. "") indicates a point of extensibility that allows other child or attribute content. Additional children and/or attributes MAY be added at the indicated extension points but MUST NOT contradict the semantics of the parent and/or owner, respectively. If a receiver does not recognize an extension, the receiver SHOULD ignore it.

or

Ellipses (i.e., "...") indicate points of extensibility. Additional children and/or attributes MAY be added at the indicated extension points but MUST NOT contradict the semantics of the parent and/or owner, respectively. By default, if a receiver does not recognize an extension, the receiver SHOULD ignore the extension; exceptions to this processing rule, if any, are clearly indicated below.
Comment 1 Robert Freund 2009-03-03 12:12:26 UTC
on 2009-02-26 proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Feb/0147.html
Comment 2 Robert Freund 2009-03-03 12:14:23 UTC
modified proposal on 200903-03 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0004.html
Comment 3 Robert Freund 2009-03-04 11:57:11 UTC
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/9/03/2009-03-03.html#6587
Resolve 6587 with {1,2,and 4} as in comment#2 but limit description of ... to simply denote an extensibility point, and move explicit description of extensibility behavior to a new section
Comment 4 Katy Warr 2009-03-16 15:43:23 UTC
EDITOR COMMENT - In progress (Katy)
Comment 5 Katy Warr 2009-03-16 18:07:13 UTC
Updates complete.
Comment 6 Jackie 2015-06-20 16:34:45 UTC
Please make my changes
Comment 7 Jackie 2015-06-20 16:35:34 UTC
Please make my changes