First Last Prev Next    No search results available
Details
: RA: Consistent text for 'Notational Conventions'
Bug#: 6587
: WS-Resource Access
: All
Status: CLOSED
Resolution: REMIND
: PC
: Windows XP
: FPWD
: P2
: minor
: ---

:
:
: hasProposal
:
:
  Show dependency tree - Show dependency graph
People
Reporter: Katy Warr <katy_warr@uk.ibm.com>
Assigned To: Katy Warr <katy_warr@uk.ibm.com>
: notifications mailing list ...
:

Attachments


Note

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Related actions


Description:   Opened: 2009-02-16 13:05
Ensure 'Notational Conventions' text is consistent across all of the ws-ra
specs.

Already highlighted is different wrt Ellipses (but other aspect of this section
should be checked):

An ellipsis (i.e. "…") indicates a point of extensibility that allows other
child or attribute content. Additional children and/or attributes MAY be added
at the indicated extension points but MUST NOT contradict the semantics of the
parent and/or owner, respectively. If a receiver does not recognize an
extension, the receiver SHOULD ignore it.

or

Ellipses (i.e., "...") indicate points of extensibility. Additional children
and/or attributes MAY be added at the indicated extension points but MUST NOT
contradict the semantics of the parent and/or owner, respectively. By default,
if a receiver does not recognize an extension, the receiver SHOULD ignore the
extension; exceptions to this processing rule, if any, are clearly indicated
below.
------- Comment #1 From Robert Freund 2009-03-03 12:12:26 -------
on 2009-02-26 proposal in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Feb/0147.html
------- Comment #2 From Robert Freund 2009-03-03 12:14:23 -------
modified proposal on 200903-03 in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0004.html
------- Comment #3 From Robert Freund 2009-03-04 11:57:11 -------
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/9/03/2009-03-03.html#6587
Resolve 6587 with {1,2,and 4} as in comment#2 but limit description of ... to
simply denote an extensibility point, and move explicit description of
extensibility behavior to a new section
------- Comment #4 From Katy Warr 2009-03-16 15:43:23 -------
EDITOR COMMENT - In progress (Katy)
------- Comment #5 From Katy Warr 2009-03-16 18:07:13 -------
Updates complete.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available