resolved 4/7//04

This BNF is wrong as the Recipient has a different format for the comments.
In fact it is like <jurisdiction>PCDATA</jurisdiction> that most of the 
recipient subelements are made. I followed that and it should have the 
same expression power. But this has to go back to the WG for agreement.

  jurisdiction= "<JURISDICTION"
   " service=" quoted-URI
   [" short-description=" quotedstring]
  ">"
[longdescription]
  "</JURISDICTION>"

Now it is like this
"&lt;jurisdiction [required]
    "service=" quoted-URI &gt;
		*recdescr                  |  ; legal entities in the jurisdiction 
"&lt;/jurisdiction&gt;                 |  ; indicated in the service URI

I re-arranged all completely and added the jurisdiction element  
under it's own point: 
http://www.w3.org/P3P/2004/WD-P3P11-20040420.html#jurisdiction