This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 626 - CDL - Collaboration Types
Summary: CDL - Collaboration Types
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: WS Choreography
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Spec (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: --
Assignee: Greg Ritzinger
QA Contact:
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/p...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-03-23 11:03 UTC by Greg Ritzinger
Modified: 2004-05-18 19:40 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Greg Ritzinger 2004-03-23 11:03:27 UTC 
>>Collaboration Types
---------------------
After reading section 2.1, I am still not clear why we need the "three" 
choreography types. What's the business motivation for such grouping? Is it 
really necessary to introduce some complexity and potential ambiguity in the 
spec level? For example, 
-	"abstract" vs "concrete" are quite different grouping criteria 
than "portable".  
-	 What's the difference between a "concrete" choreography and 
an "executable" process?
Comment 1 Martin Chapman 2004-05-18 15:40:41 UTC 
the level do not exist in the 03 apr 2004 Working draft