This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 623 - CDL - Editorial - Suggested editorial changes.
Summary: CDL - Editorial - Suggested editorial changes.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WS Choreography
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Spec: Requires Clarification (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: --
Assignee: Martin Chapman
QA Contact:
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/m...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-03-23 10:43 UTC by Greg Ritzinger
Modified: 2004-12-01 16:49 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Greg Ritzinger 2004-03-23 10:43:31 UTC
Section 1.3: Change exception to error handling as the concept of 
business exception is above WS-CDL. Look to requirements for these other 
specifications rather than dependencies. Social and technical aspect 
exists behind this suggestion.

Section 2.4.8
Change exception to error conditions. Applies in all cases and 
references throughout the document.

Section 2.5.2
An interaction activity forms the atom of composition, where multiple 
interacts are combined to form a Choreography, which can be used in 
different business contexts. A business collaboration that does not have 
atomic semantics, SHOULD be modeled as several interactions between 
participants instead of one interaction. Please explain the meaning of 
this item.

The Channel through which an interaction occurs is used to determine 
whether to enlist the interaction with an already initiated Choreography 
or to initiate a new Choreography. Within a Choreography, two or more 
related interactions MAY be grouped to form a logical conversation. The 
Channel through which an interaction occurs is used to determine whether 
to enlist the interaction with an already initiated conversation or to 
initiate a new conversation. Does this infer that the channel is the 
correlation mechanism for multiple interactions for composition? Please 
explain.

In this section in two different parts, you infer that the alignment 
occurs with the roles or the participants. Which one is it as it relates 
to information
exchange and state variables? This seems confusing or perhaps further 
clarification is required.
Comment 1 Greg Ritzinger 2004-09-07 17:16:56 UTC
Not an editorial issue. needs more discussion.