This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 6209 - [XSLFO] Typographical error in XSL-FO 1.1 Example 6.10.1.1
Summary: [XSLFO] Typographical error in XSL-FO 1.1 Example 6.10.1.1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XSLFO
Classification: Unclassified
Component: XSL-FO (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Anders Berglund
QA Contact: Mailing list for comments on XSL (XSl-FO)
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/x...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-11-06 21:32 UTC by Liam R E Quin
Modified: 2009-05-27 10:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Liam R E Quin 2008-11-06 21:32:11 UTC 
[reported by Ken Holman; re-entered by Liam]

When teaching my XSL-FO class today I noted a typographical error in 
example 6.10.1.1 of http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/ not 
yet listed in the http://www.w3.org/2006/12/xsl11-errata.html summary.

Where you have:

<fo:page-sequence id="glossary" initial-page-number="1">
   <fo:page-number-folio-prefix>
     <fo:inline>G-</fo:inline>
   </fo:page-number-folio-prefix>
   <fo:flow>...</fo:flow>
</fo:page-sequence>

... should be using the finalized name for the prefix object:

<fo:page-sequence id="glossary" initial-page-number="1">
   <fo:folio-prefix>
     <fo:inline>G-</fo:inline>
   </fo:folio-prefix>
   <fo:flow>...</fo:flow>
</fo:page-sequence>
Comment 1 Tony Graham 2009-05-27 10:45:05 UTC 
You are correct.  It is a typographical error, and the correct FO name is fo:folio-prefix.

If you are satisfied with this resolution, please change this ticket to CLOSED.