This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 5659 - schemaComplete default value
Summary: schemaComplete default value
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SML
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Interchange Format (show other bugs)
Version: LC
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Virginia Smith
QA Contact: SML Working Group discussion list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-24 06:07 UTC by Kumar Pandit
Modified: 2008-05-22 22:30 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Kumar Pandit 2008-04-24 06:07:56 UTC
schemaComplete attribute is currently defined as use=required (no default). I believe the intention behind this decision was to require the SML-IF producer make an explicit declaration regarding the completeness of the schema set. This is a good intention, but unfortunately this results in breaking all existing SML-IF files since they do not specify the schemaComplete attribute.

The WG discussed semantics of schemaComplete and decided on the following:

schemaComplete=true  : schema set is known to be complete
schemaComplete=false : schema set is not known to be complete

(see bug# 4774 for a discussion of the above.)

Note that, only the true value above is an explicit assertion. It asserts that schema set is known to be complete. On the other hand, the false value merely indicates the absence of an assertion.

Proposal:
Given the above meaning, it would be reasonable to have schemaComplete=false as the default value. 

This has 3 advantages,
1. It applies correctly to the existing models because we do not know the schemaComplete-ness of the existing models. Having this default minimizes the impact on the current models.
2. It retains the explicit declaration requirement for the true case where it makes most sense.
3. We do not have to change the meaning of true or false values.
Comment 1 John Arwe 2008-05-08 13:22:50 UTC
+1
Comment 2 Virginia Smith 2008-05-15 15:36:26 UTC
+1
Comment 3 Pratul Dublish 2008-05-22 18:59:51 UTC
Resolution on 5/22 call is to mark it editorial